Purchasing power parity and the impact of the East Asian currency crisis

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Zurbruegg ◽  
L. Allsopp
2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1093-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alipasha Razzaghipour ◽  
Grant Fleming ◽  
Richard Heaney

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zubaidi Baharumshah ◽  
Chan Tze-Haw ◽  
Stilianos Fountas

The objective of the was to determine the impact of the Price of the commodity, Purchasing Power Parity of the host country, Population of the importing country and Distance between the trading countries with respect to the quantity of fruit pulp export from Tamil Nadu. The researchers adopted analytical research data, wherein data during the time frame of 2017 was used. The analysis conducted on data indicates that there is a long run relationship between the Price, Purchasing Power Parity, Population and Distance with respect to the quantity of fruit pulp export. Furthermore, the VECM [Vector Error Correction Model] indicates error estimates can be estimated effectively for the model framed using study variables considered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-131

The research assesses the process of liberalization of trade policy of Belarus after the creation of the Customs Union (CU) due to the liberalization of non-tariff barriers. Evaluation is carried out using an error correction model with relative price changes based on the theory of purchasing power parity (PPP). In the first part of the article, a global classification of non-tariff measures developed on the basis of UNCTAD is given, and so are examples of non-tariff restrictions applied by Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. It also describes the research aiming to assess the impact of trade liberalization on wealth and economic growth. The second part contains a theoretical rationale for the model, construction of which is based on purchasing power parity in violation of the “law of one price”. The third part of the work contains a direct econometric estimation of the model. Before estimation the model is applied to prove model assumptions: in particular, the significance of the dummy variable implies liberalization of non-tariff measures, rather than a reduction of the customs tariff; non-tradable sectors are the same in the partner countries, and therefore the change of their prices is not evaluated. The result of the empirical analysis is the revealed inertness of the liberalization of non-tariff barriers in Belarus, as evidenced by the liberalization not since the creation of the Customs Union, but after several quarters. It also revealed the stimulation of consumption of imported products as a result of a decrease in their price due to liberalization.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-38
Author(s):  
Tri Widodo

AbstractThis paper examines the purchasing power parity (PPP) theorem adjusted the “productivity-bias hypothesis” or the Balassa-Samuelson effect (Balassa, 1964; Samuelson, 1964) for eight East Asian countries including Japan, New Industrializing Economies (NIE-3: Singapore; Hong Kong, China; and Korea), the ASEAN-3 (Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This paper applies three methods of analysis i.e. univariate time series, multivariate regression and Johansen multivariate cointegration. The three methods give the same conclusions. First, the PPP hypothesis does not hold in the case of the eight East Asian countries. Second, non-traded goods give significant contribution on the PPP deviation. It is confirmed by the existence of Balassa-Samuelson effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document