Use of Administrative Data for Surgical Site Infection Surveillance After Congenital Cardiac Surgery Results in Inaccurate Reporting of Surgical Site Infection Rates

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista D. Atchley ◽  
Janine M. Pappas ◽  
Andrea T. Kennedy ◽  
Susan E. Coffin ◽  
Jeffrey S. Gerber ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 463-471
Author(s):  
JLC Wong ◽  
CWY Ho ◽  
G Scott ◽  
JT Machin ◽  
TWR Briggs ◽  
...  

Introduction Surgical site infections are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients. The Getting It Right First Time surgical site infection programme set up a national survey to review surgical site infection rates in surgical units in England. The objectives were for frontline clinicians to assess the rates of infection following selected procedures, to examine the risk of significant complications and to review current practice in the prevention of surgical site infection. Methods A national survey was launched in April 2017 to assess surgical site infections within 13 specialties: breast surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, cranial neurosurgery, ear, nose and throat surgery, general surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopaedic surgery, paediatric surgery, spinal surgery, urology and vascular surgery. All participating trusts prospectively identified and collected supporting information on surgical site infections diagnosed within the six-month study period. Results Data were received from 95 NHS trusts. A total of 1807 surgical site infection cases were reported. There were variations in rates reported by trusts across specialties and procedures. Reoperations were reported in 36.2% of all identified cases, and surgical site infections are associated with a delayed discharge rate of 34.1% in our survey. Conclusion The Getting It Right First Time surgical site infection programme has introduced a different approach to infection surveillance in England. Results of the survey has demonstrated variation in surgical site infection rates among surgical units, raised the importance in addressing these issues for better patient outcomes and to reduce the financial burden on the NHS. Much work remains to be done to improve surgical site infection surveillance across surgical units and trusts in England.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 479-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Noman ◽  
Syed Faisal Mahmood ◽  
Shaheen Asif ◽  
Noureen Rahim ◽  
Ghufranullah Khan ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 450-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Finkelstein ◽  
Galit Rabino ◽  
Tania Mashiah ◽  
Yaron Bar-El ◽  
Zvi Adler ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (09) ◽  
pp. 659-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Claude Roy ◽  
Trish M. Perl

AbstractSurgical-site infections, the third most common class of nosocomial infections, cause substantial morbidity and mortality and increase hospital costs. Surveillance programs can lead to reductions in surgical-site infection rates of 35% to 50%. Herein, we will discuss the practical aspects of implementing a hospital-based surveillance program for surgical-site infections. We will review surveillance methods, patient populations that should be screened, and interventions that could reduce infection rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document