scholarly journals COVID-19 pandemic impacts on conservation research, management, and public engagement in US national parks

2021 ◽  
pp. 109038
Author(s):  
Abraham J. Miller-Rushing ◽  
Nicole Athearn ◽  
Tami Blackford ◽  
Christy Brigham ◽  
Laura Cohen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 13-36
Author(s):  
Alan D. Roe

During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many countries embraced the national park concept as a way of showcasing their scenic landscapes and developing internal tourism. Many members of the Russian Imperial Geographical Society called for a system of parks in the Russian Empire. However, following the Great October Revolution of 1917, Russian conservationists and game management professionals instead pushed the state to establish zapovedniki dedicated to scientific research as well as some that served as game preserves. As “science for science’s sake” came under more suspicion in the 1930s, many supporters of the zapovedniki promoted tourism in them to make them seem more “useful” to government officials. By the late 1930s, tens of thousands of tourists entered the zapovedniki every year. Even in a climate of fear and xenophobia, some tourism promoters used the example of US national parks as they argued that zapovedniki should accommodate still more tourists.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Mateer ◽  
B. Derrick Taff ◽  
Zachary D. Miller ◽  
Ben Lawhon

1995 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Stohlgren ◽  
James F. Quinn ◽  
Michael Ruggiero ◽  
Gary S. Waggoner

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis W. Heggie ◽  
Michael E. Amundson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie McGill ◽  
Stephanie B. Borrelle ◽  
Grace C. Wu ◽  
Kurt E. Ingeman ◽  
Jonathan B. Koch ◽  
...  

Conservation science aims to improve human wellbeing through environmental management, but the discipline must reckon with the living legacies of its history including racism and colonialism. US national parks are symbolic of conservation and ripe for examination for their contribution to socio-spatial exclusion of Black, Indigenous and other people of color from outdoor spaces. We examined the origins of over 2,000 place names in 16 (26% of) US national parks to quantify the extent that national park narratives perpetuate colonialism and racism. Through iterative thematic analysis of place name origins we constructed a decision tree for classifying place name problem types according to their dimensions of racism and colonialism (if any), which enabled quantification and spatial analysis of problem types by park. We found that these highly visible conservation landscapes commemorate individuals and words that tacitly endorse racist and anti-Indigenous ideologies at a system scale. Changing these names is one small step towards dismantling colonialist and racist narratives and towards making public conservation landscapes more inclusive.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 559-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel T Buxton ◽  
Megan F McKenna ◽  
Daniel Mennitt ◽  
Emma Brown ◽  
Kurt Fristrup ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document