scholarly journals Global lessons learned from COVID-19 mass casualty incidents

Author(s):  
Marcus J. Schultz ◽  
Oriol Roca ◽  
Gentle S. Shrestha
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mazen El Sayed ◽  
Ali F. Chami ◽  
Eveline Hitti

AbstractMass casualty incidents (MCIs) are becoming more frequent worldwide, especially in the Middle East where violence in Syria has spilled over to many neighboring countries. Lebanon lacks a coordinated prehospital response system to deal with MCIs; therefore, hospital preparedness plans are essential to deal with the surge of casualties. This report describes our experience in dealing with an MCI involving a car bomb in an urban area of downtown Beirut, Lebanon. It uses general response principles to propose a simplified response model for hospitals to use during MCIs. A summary of the debriefings following the event was developed and an analysis was performed with the aim of modifying our hospital’s existing disaster preparedness plan. Casualties’ arrival to our emergency department (ED), the performance of our hospital staff during the event, communication, and the coordination of resources, in addition to the response of the different departments, were examined. In dealing with MCIs, hospital plans should focus on triage area, patient registration and tracking, communication, resource coordination, essential staff functions, as well as on security issues and crowd control. Hospitals in other countries that lack a coordinated prehospital disaster response system can use the principles described here to improve their hospital’s resilience and response to MCIs. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018; 12: 379–385)


The first article in this series (Part I) discussed the abundant exposure of our emergency department (ED) to mass casualty incidents (MCIs), particularly over the past 14 years. This experience led us to define practical strategies that emergency departments can use to develop their own MCI response plans. In the first part, our main focus was to highlight the abrupt nature of MCIs and the subsequent need to use disaster drills. Additionally, we discussed the importance of having a tiered response and activation as well as other lessons learned from our experience to maximize the preparedness of the emergency department to receive mass casualty.In this article, we discuss the optimal way to triage patients. In addition, we will tackle the best methods for documentation and communication, which are vital yet overlooked during mass casualty incidents. We will also elaborate on what we learned from dealing with outbursts of anger and violence in the ED during MCIs and how to ensure the safety of the ED staff.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (s1) ◽  
pp. s159-s159
Author(s):  
Deborah Starkey ◽  
Denise Elliott

Introduction:A mass casualty incident presents a challenging situation in any health care setting. The value of preparation and planning for mass casualty incidents has been widely reported in the literature. The benefit of imaging, in particular, forensic radiography, in these situations is also reported. Despite this, the inclusion of detailed planning on the use of forensic radiography is an observed gap in disaster preparedness documentation.Aim:To identify the role of forensic radiography in mass casualty incidents and to explore the degree of inclusion of forensic radiography in publicly available disaster planning documents.Methods:An extended literature review was undertaken to identify examples of forensic radiography in mass casualty incidents, and to determine the degree of inclusion of forensic radiography in publicly available disaster planning documents. Where included, the activity undertaken by forensic radiography was reviewed in relation to the detail of the planning information.Results:Limited results were identified of disaster planning documents containing detail of the role or planned activity for forensic radiography.Discussion:While published accounts of situation debriefing and lessons learned from past mass casualty incidents provide evidence for integration into future planning activities, limited reports were identified with the inclusion of forensic radiography. This presentation provides an overview of the roles of forensic radiography in mass casualty incidents. The specific inclusion of planning for the use of imaging in mass fatality incidents is recommended.


Over the last century, mass casualty incidents (MCIs) affected many nations and their emergency departments. The unscheduled arrival of large number of injured victims over a short period of time often causes major chaos and crowding. When a rapid surge in operational needs overwhelms available Emergency Department (ED) resources and personnel, the chaos and overwhelming mismatch between needs and resources can quickly spread to the rest of the hospital.1, 2 Nonetheless, as the front door of the hospital, the ED plays a pivotal role in determining the quality and effectiveness of an institution’s MCI response. This requires effective planning, which translates into preparedness. Unfortunately, many EDs are overburdened even on regular days. Damaged infrastructure further compounds the challenge.


Author(s):  
Wesley D Jetten ◽  
Jeroen Seesink ◽  
Markus Klimek

Abstract Objective: The primary aim of this study is to review the available tools for prehospital triage in case of mass casualty incidents and secondly, to develop a tool which enables lay person first responders (LPFRs) to perform triage and start basic life support in mass casualty incidents. Methods: In July 2019, online databases were consulted. Studies addressing prehospital triage methods for lay people were analyzed. Secondly, a new prehospital triage tool for LPFRs was developed. Therefore, a search for prehospital triage models available in literature was conducted and triage actions were extracted. Results: The search resulted in 6188 articles, and after screening, a scoping review of 4 articles was conducted. All articles stated that there is great potential to provide accurate prehospital triage by people with no healthcare experience. Based on these findings, and combined with the pre-existing prehospital triage tools, we developed a, not-yet validated, prehospital triage tool for lay people, which may improve disaster awareness and preparedness and might positively contribute to community resilience. Conclusion: The prehospital triage tool for lay person first responders may be useful and may help professional medical first responders to determine faster, which casualties most urgently need help in a mass casualty incident.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document