scholarly journals Intraoperative cell salvage

BJA Education ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
C. Carroll ◽  
F. Young
2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Dixon ◽  
Virge James ◽  
Daniel Hind ◽  
Craig J. Currie

Objectives:This study aims to provide the first estimates of the costs and effects of the large scale introduction of autologous transfusion technologies into the United Kingdom National Health Service.Methods:A model was constructed to allow disparate data sources to be combined to produce estimates of the scale, costs, and effects of introducing four interventions. The interventions considered were preparing patients for surgery (PPS) clinics, preoperative autologous donation (PAD), intraoperative cell salvage (ICS), and postoperative cell salvage (PoCS).Results:The key determinants of cost per operation are the anticipated level of reductions in blood use, the mean level of blood use, mean length of stay, and the cost of the technology. The results show the potential for considerable reductions in blood use. The greatest reductions are anticipated to be through the use of PPS and ICS. Vascular surgery, transplant surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery appear to be the specialties that will benefit most from the technologies.Conclusions:Several simplifications were used in the production of these estimates; consequently, caution should be used in their interpretation and use. Despite the drawbacks in the methods used in the study, the model shows the scale of the issue, the importance of gathering better data, and the form that data must take. Such preliminary modeling exercises are essential for rational policy development and to direct future research and discussion among stakeholders.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Gorin ◽  
Ahmed Eldefrawy ◽  
Murugesan Manoharan ◽  
Mark S. Soloway

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 568-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong G. Peng ◽  
Gregory M. Janelle ◽  
Erik R. Perschau ◽  
Matthew D. Forthofer ◽  
Nikolaus Gravenstein

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e024108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadra Galaal ◽  
Alberto Lopes ◽  
Colin Pritchard ◽  
Andrew Barton ◽  
Jennifer Wingham ◽  
...  

IntroductionOvarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecological cancer, with more than 7000 new cases registered in the UK in 2014. In patients suitable for surgery, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidance for treatment recommends surgical resection of all macroscopic tumour, followed by chemotherapy. The surgical procedure can be extensive and associated with substantial blood loss which is conventionally replaced with a donor blood transfusion. While often necessary and lifesaving, the use of donor blood is associated with increased risks of complications and adverse surgical outcomes. Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is a blood conservation strategy in which red cells collected from blood lost during surgery are returned to the patient thus minimising the use of donor blood. This is the protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study and feasibility economic evaluation. If feasible, a later definitive trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICS reinfusion versus donor blood transfusion in ovarian cancer surgery.Methods and analysisSixty adult women scheduled for primary or interval ovarian cancer surgery at participating UK National Health Service Trusts will be recruited and individually randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive ICS reinfusion or donor blood (as required) during surgery. Participants will be followed up by telephone at 30 days postoperatively for adverse events monitoring and by postal questionnaire at 6 weeks and 3 monthly thereafter, to capture quality of life and resource use data. Qualitative interviews will capture participants’ and clinicians’ experiences of the study.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been granted ethical approval by the South West–Exeter Research Ethics Committee (ref: 16/SW/0256). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and will inform the design of a larger trial.Trial registration numberISRCTN19517317.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars W.P. Reijngoud ◽  
Christophe Pattyn ◽  
Roel De Haan ◽  
Filip De Somer ◽  
Pat A. Campbell ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 730-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan M. Nieder ◽  
Adrienne J.K. Carmack ◽  
Paul D. Sved ◽  
Sandy S. Kim ◽  
Murugesan Manoharan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document