scholarly journals The early response of plastic and reconstructive surgery services to the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 2063-2071
Author(s):  
Louis Boyce ◽  
Marios Nicolaides ◽  
John Gerrard Hanrahan ◽  
Michail Sideris ◽  
Georgios Pafitanis
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-712
Author(s):  
Christian Tapking ◽  
Alexis L. Boson ◽  
Victoria G. Rontoyanni ◽  
Karl F. Kowalewski ◽  
Gabriel Hundeshagen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 736-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna S. Vyas ◽  
H. Rhodes Hambrick ◽  
Afaaf Shakir ◽  
Shane D. Morrison ◽  
Duy C. Tran ◽  
...  

JPRAS Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Nehme ◽  
Jonathan James Neville ◽  
Ali Nehme Bahsoun

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (04) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidong Weng ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
William Lineaweaver ◽  
Weiyang Gao ◽  
Hede Yan

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1022-1034
Author(s):  
Malke Asaad ◽  
Jacob K Dey ◽  
Ahmad Al-Mouakeh ◽  
Mohamad Baraa Manjouna ◽  
Mohammad A Nashed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The use of eye-tracking technology in plastic surgery has gained popularity over the past decade due to its ability to assess observers’ visual preferences in an objective manner. Objectives The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of eye-tracking studies in plastic and reconstructive surgery, which can aid in the design and conduct of high-quality eye-tracking studies. Methods Through application of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of articles published on eye-tracking across several databases was conducted from January 1946 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria included studies evaluating the use of eye-tracking technology in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The resulting publications were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Results A total of 595 articles were identified, 23 of which met our inclusion criteria. The most common application of eye-tracking was to assess individuals with cleft lip/palate (9 studies). All 19 studies that evaluated fixation patterns among conditions vs controls reported significant differences between the 2 groups. Five out of 7 studies assessing visual data between preoperative and postoperative patients identified significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative groups, whereas 2 studies did not. Nine studies examined the relation between severity indices, attractiveness scores, or personality ratings and gaze patterns. Correlation was found in 7 out of the 9 studies. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates the utility of eye-tracking technology as a quantifiable objective assessment and emerging research tool for evaluating outcomes in several domains of plastic and reconstructive surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D. Dobbs ◽  
Olivia Cundy ◽  
Harsh Samarendra ◽  
Khurram Khan ◽  
Iain Stuart Whitaker

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Speiser ◽  
Aurora Almadori ◽  
Benjamin J. Langridge ◽  
Peter EM Butler

Abstract BackgroundAutologous fat grafting has become an established therapeutic entity in several regions of the body. Especially in the facial region, AFG has been widely applied in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Indications include reconstructive purposes such as primary genetic disorders in maxillofacial development, or secondary asymmetries following primary reconstructive surgery. In addition, AFG has found several applications in the field of aesthetic surgery, such as skin rejuvenation. In addition to conventional AFG, recently several alternative strategies of grafting have been developed. Examples for these are transplantation of a graft including adipose derived stem cells (ADSC’s), cell-assisted lipofilling (CAL), and grafting with stromal vascular fraction (SVF). Until today, there is no common consensus on how to measure a successful outcome of autologous graft transplantation in the facial region. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the current available outcome measurement methods, and compare them with regards to accuracy, cost-effectiveness, safety and validation in the clinical setting. The quality of evidence of included publications will be assessed using the GRADE strategy.MethodsA comprehensive, structured literature search of published articles will be conducted. This is designed by authors and performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA-P). The literature search will be performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane Library, including publications from inception to May 2020. Two independent authors will conduct the search, screen the articles, and complete data collection. The main outcome will be which methods are currently used to determine a successful fat grafting procedure in the face. We propose to review the current methods used to establish their overall performance in several domains. In addition, patients measured via the 3D volumetric photography method will be further analysed with regards to accuracy of the camera and retention of fat per method and ml injected.Discussion Autologous fat grafting in the facial region has gained significant attention in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery in the past decades. In light of the growing public interest in this topic, a systematic review of the outcome measurement tools is of essence. We will critically evaluate all approaches currently in practice and give a recommendation regarding several aspects of use. A common approach to measurement and reporting of results fosters an environment of high-standard healthcare delivery and promotes future research and informed clinical practice. In addition, we will further analyse the outcomes of different grafting methods using 3D volumetric photography as measurement tool. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020213407


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document