scholarly journals Improving breast cancer care coordination and symptom management by using AI driven predictive toolkits

The Breast ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.C. Moser ◽  
Gayatri Narayan
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
E. E. Hahn ◽  
P. A. Ganz ◽  
M. E. Melisko ◽  
J. P. Pierce ◽  
M. M. Von Friederichs-Fitzwater ◽  
...  

212 Background: The ATHENA Breast Health Network collaboration is a large scale, UC system-wide project initiated with the intent to drive innovation in breast cancer prevention, screening and treatment. An IRB approved research protocol was developed to examine survivorship care across Network sites, which includes key informant interviews at each site and patient/survivor surveys. This abstract presents preliminary analyses from the key informant interviews. Methods: Investigators at each site conducted semi-structured interviews with oncology specialists and primary care providers (PCPs). Interviews used case study examples and open and closed-ended questions on the delivery of post-treatment breast cancer care. Informant responses were manually recorded by the interviewer, compiled in a database, then coded and analyzed using NVIVO9 software. Results: There were 39 key informants across five participating UC sites: 14 medical oncologists, 7 radiation oncologists, 11 surgeons, 3 oncology nurses, and 4 PCPs. Care coordination is a major unprompted theme identified in the interviews. 85% of all participants reported using shared care coordination between PCP and oncology for post-treatment follow-up. 49% report the need for greater care coordination in general, and 28% report the need for greater care coordination within oncology, particularly to help avoid duplication of follow-up care and services. The responses demonstrate wide variability among provider types and institutions (Table). Additional analyses from this study will be updated in our presentation. Conclusions: These preliminary results identify the need for focus on care coordination during the post-treatment phase of breast cancer care within the UC system. [Table: see text]


Medical Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Scheck McAlearney ◽  
Kelsey Murray ◽  
Cynthia Sieck ◽  
Jenny J. Lin ◽  
Bonnie Bellacera ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 690-693
Author(s):  
Delphine Héquet ◽  
Nicolas Pouget ◽  
Julien Seror ◽  
Cyrille Huchon ◽  
Mathieu Robain ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
Nancy K. Janz ◽  
Sarah E. Lillie ◽  
Christopher R. Friese ◽  
Jennifer J. Griggs ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Alvarado‐Cabrero ◽  
Franco Doimi ◽  
Virginia Ortega ◽  
Jurema Telles Oliveira Lima ◽  
Rubén Torres ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482096628
Author(s):  
Erica Choe ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Ma’at Hembrick ◽  
Christine Dauphine ◽  
Junko Ozao-Choy

Background While prior studies have shown the apparent health disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, there is a gap in knowledge with respect to access to breast cancer care among minority women. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2014 to 2016 to evaluate how patients presented and accessed cancer care services in our urban safety net hospital. Patient demographics, cancer stage, history of breast cancer screening, and process of referral to cancer care were collected and analyzed. Results Of the 202 patients identified, 61 (30%) patients were younger than the age of 50 and 75 (63%) were of racial minority background. Only 39% of patients with a new breast cancer were diagnosed on screening mammogram. Women younger than the age of 50 ( P < .001) and minority women ( P < .001) were significantly less likely to have had any prior screening mammograms. Furthermore, in patients who met the screening guideline age, more than half did not have prior screening mammograms. Discussion Future research should explore how to improve breast cancer screening rates within our county patient population and the potential need for revision of screening guidelines for minority patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. S260-S261
Author(s):  
Sarah P. Shubeck ◽  
Margaret E. Smith ◽  
Ton Wang ◽  
Tasha Hughes ◽  
Lesly A. Dossett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document