scholarly journals Metastasectomy versus radiation of secondary sites in stage IV breast cancer: Analysis from a national cancer registry

The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeem Bilani ◽  
Marita Yaghi ◽  
Olivia Main ◽  
Mihir Naik ◽  
Iktej Jabbal ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1092-1092
Author(s):  
Mary Kathryn Abel ◽  
Michelle E. Melisko ◽  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
Amy Jo Chien ◽  
Italia Diaz ◽  
...  

1092 Background: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are often used to measure tumor response in cancer trials, especially in the stage IV setting. However, RECIST requires measurable disease, which is less common in invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) of the breast, a diffusely growing tumor type, compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We examined the prevalence of RECIST in breast cancer clinical trials, and whether there are differential trial enrollment rates by histology and stage. Methods: We analyzed the clinicaltrials.gov database to evaluate the proportion of interventional, stage IV clinical trials that require measurable disease as inclusion criteria or outcome measures. We then performed an institutional cohort study comparing the proportion of patients in the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) OnCore clinical trials management system (CTMS) to the UCSF Cancer Registry between 2000-2018, stratified by histology and stage. We hypothesized that the proportion of patients with ILC in the CTMS would be significantly lower than in the cancer registry. Results: There were 146 actively-recruiting, interventional clinical trials for stage IV breast cancer that were identified in our search on clinicaltrials.gov. Overall, 108 (74%) required measurable disease for study participation. The UCSF Cancer Registry included 8,679 patients, while the UCSF OnCore CTMS included 1,511 patients (Table). In those with early stage disease, where RECIST is not typically used, there was no difference in the proportion of ILC patients enrolled in clinical trials versus in the cancer registry. However, among those with stage IV disease, there was a significantly lower proportion of patients with ILC in the CTMS than in the cancer registry (9.2% versus 17.9%, p = 0.005). In contrast, patients with stage IV IDC were overrepresented in the clinical trials database compared to the cancer registry. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic ILC were significantly less likely to be enrolled in clinical trials than those with metastatic IDC. This decreased enrollment may be due to the widespread use of RECIST, and further investigation is needed to ensure equity in access to clinical trials.[Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
DR. SEEMA KHAN ◽  
DR. BLAKE CADY

Author(s):  
Yoanna S. Pumpalova ◽  
Oluwatosin A. Ayeni ◽  
Wenlong Carl Chen ◽  
Daniel S. O’Neil ◽  
Sarah Nietz ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 444-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Manni ◽  
Jaime E. Trujillo ◽  
James S. Marshall ◽  
Jerald Brodkey ◽  
Olof H. Pearson

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Yu He ◽  
Chen-Lu Lian ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Jian Lei ◽  
Li Hua ◽  
...  

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of biological factors, including histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status in de novo stage IV breast cancer. Based on eligibility, patient data deposited between 2010 and 2014 were collected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. The receiver operating characteristics curve, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used for analysis. We included 8725 patients with a median 3-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of 52.6%. Higher histologic grade, HER2-negative, ER-negative, and PR-negative disease were significantly associated with lower BCSS in the multivariate prognostic analysis. A risk score staging system separated patients into four risk groups. The risk score was assigned according to a point system: 1 point for grade 3, 1 point if hormone receptor-negative, and 1 point if HER2-negative. The 3-year BCSS was 76.3%, 64.5%, 48.5%, and 23.7% in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 points, respectively, with a median BCSS of 72, 52, 35, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The multivariate prognostic analysis showed that the risk score staging system was an independent prognostic factor associated with BCSS. Patients with a higher risk score had a lower BCSS. Sensitivity analyses replicated similar findings after stratification according to tumor stage, nodal stage, the sites of distant metastasis, and the number of distant metastasis. In conclusion, our risk score staging system shows promise for the prognostic stratification of de novo stage IV breast cancer.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R Carmichael ◽  
E.D.C Anderson ◽  
U Chetty ◽  
J.M Dixon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document