scholarly journals An efficient algorithm for large scale global optimization of continuous functions

2007 ◽  
Vol 206 (2) ◽  
pp. 1015-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Jun Wang ◽  
Jiang-She Zhang
Author(s):  
Kyle Robert Harrison ◽  
Azam Asilian Bidgoli ◽  
Shahryar Rahnamayan ◽  
Kalyanmoy Deb

Algorithms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Aleksei Vakhnin ◽  
Evgenii Sopov

Modern real-valued optimization problems are complex and high-dimensional, and they are known as “large-scale global optimization (LSGO)” problems. Classic evolutionary algorithms (EAs) perform poorly on this class of problems because of the curse of dimensionality. Cooperative Coevolution (CC) is a high-performed framework for performing the decomposition of large-scale problems into smaller and easier subproblems by grouping objective variables. The efficiency of CC strongly depends on the size of groups and the grouping approach. In this study, an improved CC (iCC) approach for solving LSGO problems has been proposed and investigated. iCC changes the number of variables in subcomponents dynamically during the optimization process. The SHADE algorithm is used as a subcomponent optimizer. We have investigated the performance of iCC-SHADE and CC-SHADE on fifteen problems from the LSGO CEC’13 benchmark set provided by the IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation. The results of numerical experiments have shown that iCC-SHADE outperforms, on average, CC-SHADE with a fixed number of subcomponents. Also, we have compared iCC-SHADE with some state-of-the-art LSGO metaheuristics. The experimental results have shown that the proposed algorithm is competitive with other efficient metaheuristics.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 781-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Pei Lee ◽  
Chih-Jen Lin

Linear rankSVM is one of the widely used methods for learning to rank. Although its performance may be inferior to nonlinear methods such as kernel rankSVM and gradient boosting decision trees, linear rankSVM is useful to quickly produce a baseline model. Furthermore, following its recent development for classification, linear rankSVM may give competitive performance for large and sparse data. A great deal of works have studied linear rankSVM. The focus is on the computational efficiency when the number of preference pairs is large. In this letter, we systematically study existing works, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and propose an efficient algorithm. We discuss different implementation issues and extensions with detailed experiments. Finally, we develop a robust linear rankSVM tool for public use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document