scholarly journals The global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among operating room personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Tavakkol ◽  
Esmaeil Kavi ◽  
Soheil Hassanipour ◽  
Hadiseh Rabiei ◽  
Mahdi Malakoutikhah
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-85
Author(s):  
Mehdi Ameri ◽  
Mohammad Reza Hosseini Nodoushan ◽  
Amir Shahbazzadeh ◽  
Mehran Arab Ahmadi

Background: Most nurses, especially operating room personnel, seems to be more likely to be affected by mood disorders than other social strata. The present study attempted to systematically review the prevalence of depression and its main determinants among operating room personnel in Iran. Methods: The method of this systematic review is documenting in a published protocol in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. After this massive search, titles and abstracts of retrieved documents have screened and all irrelevant articles excluded. Two reviewers screened the documents and selected all relevant studies and assessed included articles separately. Results: Totally, 12 citations found in the initial literature search where four citations excluded, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The final number of studies available for analysis was 12 including a total of 373 operating room personnel (86 men and 287 women, mean the age of 27.71 years ranged from 20 to 36 years). The pooled prevalence of depression among operating room personnel was estimated to be 45.3%. In this regard, 27.0% of personnel suffered from severe depression. A significant heterogeneity found in the overall analysis of the overall prevalence of depression and its severe pattern. Conclusion: A notable number of operating room personnel in Iran suffer from depression even in its severe condition emphasizing the importance of the managerial approach to minimize its adverse effects on their performance as well as to improve their quality of life


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Mahdi Malakoutikhah ◽  
Reza Tavakkol ◽  
Neda Hatami ◽  
Soheil Hassanipour

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-194
Author(s):  
R. Clijsen ◽  
J. Taeymans ◽  
J. P. Baeyens ◽  
A. O. Barel ◽  
P. Clarys

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e038854
Author(s):  
Carlos Tersa-Miralles ◽  
Roland Pastells-Peiró ◽  
Francesc Rubí-Carnacea ◽  
Filip Bellon ◽  
Esther Rubinat Arnaldo

IntroductionPhysical inactivity due to changes in our society towards more sedentary behaviours is leading to health problems. Increasing physical activity might be a good strategy to improve physical strength and reduce the prevalence of illnesses associated with prolonged sitting. Office workers exhibit a sedentary lifestyle with short rest periods or even without pauses during the workday. It is important to perform workplace interventions to treat musculoskeletal disorders caused by prolonged sitting and lack of movement adopted on the office setting. This article describes a protocol for a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise interventions on office workers in their work environment.Methods and analysisA literature search will be performed in the PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ISI WoS and PeDRO databases for randomised controlled trials and studies published from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2020 in English or Spanish. The participants will be office workers who spend most of their work time in a sitting position. The interventions performed will include any type of exercise intervention in the workplace. The outcome measures will vary in accordance with the aim of the intervention observed. The results of the review and the outcomes from the studies reviewed will be summarised with a narrative synthesis. The review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. The review outcomes and the additional data obtained will be disseminated through publications and in scientific conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020177462.


Author(s):  
C.S. Tibúrcio‐Machado ◽  
C. Michelon ◽  
F.B. Zanatta ◽  
M.S. Gomes ◽  
J.A. Marin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document