The expanding amyloid family: Structure, stability, function, and pathogenesis

Cell ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 184 (19) ◽  
pp. 4857-4873
Author(s):  
Michael R. Sawaya ◽  
Michael P. Hughes ◽  
Jose A. Rodriguez ◽  
Roland Riek ◽  
David S. Eisenberg
ACS Nano ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 9855-9865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago N. Figueira ◽  
Diogo A. Mendonça ◽  
Diana Gaspar ◽  
Manuel N. Melo ◽  
Anne Moscona ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Shana L. Pribesh ◽  
Jane Smith Carson ◽  
Mikaela J. Dufur ◽  
Yuanyuan Yue ◽  
Kathy Morgan

The family environments children live in have profound effects on the skills, resources, and attitudes those children bring to school. Researchers studying family structure have found that children who live with two married, opposite-sex, biological parents, on average, have better educational outcomes than children living in alternate family structures, perhaps due to higher resources, lower stressors, or different selectivity patterns. Socioeconomic stratification plays a major role in family structure, with low-income families seeing more instability. We argue that the impact of family structure is attenuated by transitions in and out of family structures that may decrease a specific resource important to child academic outcomes: parental involvement. This may contribute to increased academic differences already noted across class gaps. Using waves 1 to 6 of the Growing Up in Australia: Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) data, we examine the relationship of family stability and transitions from birth to age 10/11 years on parental involvement and educational outcomes, adjusted for resource, stressor, and selectivity covariates. We find that changes in parental involvement are only apparent for families that experience both a transition and single parenting, and that these differences in parental involvement impact academic outcomes.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 360-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruo Kasai ◽  
Masanori Matsuzaki ◽  
Jun Noguchi ◽  
Nobuaki Yasumatsu ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakahara

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahel Bachem ◽  
Andreas Maercker

Abstract. The present study introduces a revised Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale, a new conceptualization and operationalization of the resilience indicator SOC. It outlines the scale development and aims for testing its reliability, factor structure, and validity. Literature on Antonovsky’s SOC (SOC-A) was critically reviewed to identify needs for improving the scale. The scale was investigated in two samples. Sample 1 consisted of 334 bereaved participants, Sample 2 of 157 healthy controls. The revised SOC Scale, SOC-A, and theoretically relevant questionnaires were applied. Explorative and confirmatory factor analyses established a three-factor structure in both samples. The revised SOC Scale showed significant but discriminative associations with related constructs, including self-efficacy, posttraumatic growth, and neuroticism. The revised measure was significantly associated with psychological health indicators, including persistent grief, depression, and anxiety, but not to the extent as the previous SOC-A. Stability over time was sufficient. The study provides psychometric support for the revised SOC conceptualization and scale. It has several advantages over the previous SOC-A scale (unique variance, distinct factor structure, stability). The scale could be used for clinical and health psychological testing or research into the growing field of studies on resilience over the life span.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document