scholarly journals Association Between Low Trough Levels of Vedolizumab During Induction Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Need for Additional Doses Within 6 Months

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1750-1757.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Williet ◽  
Gilles Boschetti ◽  
Marion Fovet ◽  
Thomas Di Bernado ◽  
Pierre Claudez ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-367
Author(s):  
Giorgia Bodini ◽  
Maria Giulia Demarzo ◽  
Margherita Saracco ◽  
Claudia Coppo ◽  
Isabella Baldissarro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1269.2-1270
Author(s):  
T. Nuriakhmetova ◽  
I. K. Valeeva ◽  
J. Shevnina ◽  
D. Abdulganieva

Background:The features of the underlying immune-mediated disease can affect the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of the biologic agents, which are among the important predictors of loss of response to TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi).Objectives:To compare the frequency of TNFi low trough levels and their immunogenicity in the treatment of rheumatic diseases (RD) (ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) (Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)).Methods:Among 120 patients (40 with AS (33.3%), 19 with RA (15.8%), 42 with CD (35%), and 19 with UC (15.8%)), trough level of infliximab (INX) (n=36, 30%), adalimumab (ADM) (n=45, 37.5%) and certolizumab pegol (CZP) (n=39, 32.5%) and the level of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) were measured in the serum samples drawn directly before the planned drug administration.Results:Low drug level (below 0.5 μg/mL for INX1, 4.9 µg/ml for ADM2, and 20 µg/l for CZP3) was found in 54 (45%) patients: in 33 (55.9%) patients with RD and 21 (34.4%) patients with IBD. In the RD group, low drug trough level was observed more often than in IBD (55.9% vs 34.4%, OR 2.418, 95% CI 1.157 to 5.052, p=0.018). Only in UC was there a relationship between the received low dose of the drug (up to 200 mg of INX, 40 mg of ADM, and 200 mg of CZP) and its low level in the serum (p=0.026). Among the additional factors associated with a low TNFi level, lower dose of concomitant therapy at the time of a biologic initiation (66.7% vs 20.8%, OR 7.6, 95% CI 1.388 to 41.617, p=0.033) and the absence of pseudopolyps (78.9% vs 21.1%, p=0.045) were found in IBD, and in case of RD these factors included the age of 30 to 45 years (72.7% vs 41.9%, OR 3.692, 95 % CI 1.136 to 12.0, p=0.026), the absence of comorbidities (58.6% vs 41.4%, OR 3.44, 1.09 to 10.858, p=0.032) and male gender (78.8% vs 50% in women, OR 3.714, 95% CI 1.194 to 11.552, p=0.02).ADAb were detected in 29 (24.2%) patients (7 to INX (19.4%), 8 (17.8%) to ADM, 14 (35.9%) to CZP), 23 (79.3%) of which had also a concomitant low trough level of the drug. There were no significant differences in the frequency of ADAb formation between the pathologies. In the AS group, antibodies to CZP were detected in all patients with a low level of the biologic, while only in 25% of patients receiving ADM, a low level was associated with the formation of ADAb (p=0.019). In addition, among patients with AS, ADAb were detected only in those patients who did not take prednisone at the time of blood serum sampling (100% vs 37.9%, p=0.037).Conclusion:Low level of TNFi is more common in RD than in IBD. For each group, the factors associated with a low trough level of TNFi were identified. There were no significant differences in the frequency of ADAb formation between nosologies.References:[1]Steenholdt C, Bendtzen K, Brynskov J, et al. Cut-off levels and diagnostic accuracy of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 310–318.[2]Bartelds GM, Krieckaert CL, Nurmohamed MT, van Schouwenburg PA, Lems WF, Twisk JW, Dijkmans BA, Aarden L, Wolbink GJ. Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up. JAMA. 2011;305:1460–1468. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.406.[3]Gehin, J.E., Goll, G.L., Warren, D.J. et al. Associations between certolizumab pegol serum levels, anti-drug antibodies and treatment response in patients with inflammatory joint diseases: data from the NOR-DMARD study. Arthritis Res Ther 21, 256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-2009-5Disclosure of Interests:Tatiana Nuriakhmetova Grant/research support from: A grant to purchase reagents for scientific research from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Ildariya Khairullovna Valeeva: None declared., Jana Shevnina: None declared., Diana Abdulganieva: None declared.


Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. e19359
Author(s):  
Ana B. Grinman ◽  
Maria das Graças C. de Souza ◽  
Eliete Bouskela ◽  
Ana Teresa P. Carvalho ◽  
Heitor S. P. de Souza

Author(s):  
Gherardo Tapete ◽  
Lorenzo Bertani ◽  
Alberto Pieraccini ◽  
Erica Nicola Lynch ◽  
Martina Giannotta ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundFew data are currently available about SB5 in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of SB5 in a cohort of patients with IBD in stable remission switched from the adalimumab (ADA) originator and in a cohort of patients with IBD naïve to ADA.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled patients with IBD who started ADA treatment with SB5 (naïve cohort) and those who underwent a nonmedical switch from the ADA originator to SB5 (switching cohort). Clinical remission and safety were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. In addition, in a small cohort of patients who were switched, we assessed the ADA serum trough levels and antidrug antibodies at baseline, 3, and 6 months.ResultsIn the naïve cohort, the overall remission rate at 12 months was 60.42%, whereas in the switching cohort it was 89.02%. Fifty-three (36.3%) patients experienced an adverse event, and injection site pain was the most common; it was significantly more frequent in the switching cohort (P = 0.001). No differences were found in terms of ADA serum trough levels at baseline, 3, and 6 months after switching. No patient developed antidrug antibodies after the switch.ConclusionsWe found that SB5 seemed effective and safe in IBD, both in the naïve cohort and in the switching cohort. Further studies are needed to confirm these data in terms of mucosal healing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S374-S375
Author(s):  
S Kato ◽  
N Yamaga ◽  
A Ishibashi ◽  
K Kani ◽  
S Nagoshi

Abstract Background Anti-TNF α antibodies have contributed to the good prognosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Adherence of these drugs affects the treatment effects in patients with IBDs. Recently, the use of an adalimumab (ADA) autoinjector (AI) was approved in Japan. However, the effects of the use of this AI in patients with IBDs are not clear. We elucidated whether the use of an AI for ADA administration improves the adherence to and acceptability of ADA therapy compared with the use of syringe (SYR) type. Methods This was a single-centre prospective observational study approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. Twenty-six quiescent IBD patients, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, treated by administration of ADA 40 mg using SYR every other week for >6 months or naive to ADA were enrolled in this study. The patients administered treatment using SYR were switched to an AI. The AI-naive and AI-switched patients were administered ADA treatment using AI for 6 months. The levels of adherence and acceptability, including pain and satisfaction levels, were measured using the visual analogue scale before and after treatment with ADA administered using AI. Serum ADA trough levels were also examined. Results Of the 26 enrolled patients, 1 with selection error, 1 with a rejection of approval and 2 with recurrence were excluded. In total, 24 participants were included in the final analysis. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 12.6 (8.4) years. Of the participants, 54.5% (12/22) were male, 68.2% (15/22) had ulcerative colitis, 27.3% (6/22) used thiopurine and 77.35 (17/22) were administered treatment using SYR. The adherence rate improved after switching to AI. The adherence rate of patients who received maintenance ADA was not significantly different from that of the ADA-naive patients (SYR type: 89.1 ± 12.7 mm, AI-switch: 94.0 ± 8.6 mm, AI-naive: 87.0 ± 21.6 mm, not significant [NS]). According to the acceptability of ADA AI, the pain intensity significantly decreased after switching. It was also significantly lower in the AI-naive group than in the SYR group (SYR: 55.0 ± 24.8 mm, AI-switch*: 87.3 ± 15.4 mm, AI-naive*: 92.2 ± 10.1 mm, *p < 0.01 compared with SYR). The level of satisfaction significantly increased after switching (SYR: 62.6 ± 27.9 mm, AI-switch*: 85.9 ± 12.5 mm, AI-naive: 81.2 ± 20.9 mm; *p < 0.01, compared with SYR). The ADA trough level was not significantly different after switching (SYR: 11.0 ± 9.1 mg/ml, AI-switch: 9.9 ± 5.5 mg/ml, NS). Conclusion ADA administration using AI resulted in significantly improved acceptability without changes in serum ADA trough levels.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S226-S227
Author(s):  
G Bodini ◽  
M G Demarzo ◽  
M Saracco ◽  
C Coppo ◽  
I Baldissarro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document