scholarly journals Previous Use of Antithrombotic Agents Reduces Mortality and Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With High-risk Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-447.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip D.J. Dunne ◽  
Stig B. Laursen ◽  
Loren Laine ◽  
Harry R. Dalton ◽  
Jing H. Ngu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Namita Mohanty ◽  
Arjun Nataraj Kannan

Background: Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score (GBS), was developed to predict the need for hospital-based intervention (transfusion, endoscopic therapy or surgery) or death following upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Study evaluated the Glasgow Blatchford score’s (GBS) ability to identify high risk patients who needed blood transfusion in patients with UGI haemorrhage.Methods: A total of 270 cases admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the Medical ICU/Wards of MKCG Medical College were put on Blatchford scoring system and classified as those requiring (high risk = GBS >1) and not requiring blood transfusion (low risk) based on the score assigned on admission and a correlation between initial scoring and requirement of blood transfusion was done.Results: Units of blood transfusion required, the GBS and duration of hospital stay were significantly lower among the low risk group, all with p value <0.001. No blood transfusion was required in patients with GBS <3. There was significant correlation between GB score and requirement of blood transfusion (p <0.001) and duration of hospital stay (p <0.001). GBS had 100% sensitivity, negative predictive value and positive likelihood ratio, when a cut off of > 16 was used in predicting mortality.Conclusions: Patients presenting with Upper GI bleeding can be triaged in casualty with Glasgow Blatchford scoring. Patients with a low score of less than or equal to 3 can be safely discharged and reviewed on follow up thereby reducing admission, allowing more efficient use of hospital resources.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Harold Benites-Goñi ◽  
Martín Pascacio-Fiori ◽  
Fiorella Monge-Del Valle ◽  
Zuly Plácido-Damián ◽  
Evelyn Gonzales-Carazas ◽  
...  

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopic procedures are associated with a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, in cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), priority should be given to an early endoscopy. Objective: The main objective was to compare the time since arrival at the hospital and the performance of the endoscopy between both groups. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study. Data contains information of patients who attended to the hospital with UGIB and underwent an endoscopy between October 19th, 2019 and June 6th, 2020. Patients were divided into 2 phases: pre-pandemic and pandemic. The time between arrival at the hospital and the performance of the endoscopy in both phases were compared as well as other indicators such hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Results: With information from 219 patients, the median age was 69 years. 154 and 65 endoscopies were performed in pre-pandemic and pandemic phase, respectively. The time between arrival at the hospital and the performance of the endoscopy was significantly longer duringthe pandemic (10.00 vs. 13.08 hours, p-value = 0.019). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in hospital stay or mortality. Conclusion: The management of patients with UGIB during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex and requires the application of clinical judgment to decide the best timing to perform an endoscopy without affecting patient care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document