Clinical and Molecular Factors Associated With Histologic Response to Topical Steroid Treatment in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Summary Inflammatory factors in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), including major basic protein (MBP), eotaxin-3 (EOT3) and mast cell tryptase (TRP), may predict treatment response to topical corticosteroids (tCS). We aimed to determine whether baseline levels of these markers predict response to tCS for EoE. To do this, we analyzed data from a randomized trial comparing two topical steroids for treatment of newly diagnosed EoE (NCT02019758). A pretreatment esophageal biopsy was stained for MBP, EOT3, and TRP to quantify tissue biomarker levels (cells/mm2). Levels were compared between histologic responders (<15 eos/hpf) and nonresponders (the primary outcome), and endoscopic responders (EREFS<2) and nonresponders. Complete histologic response (<1 eos/hpf) was also assessed, and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. We also evaluated whether baseline staining predicted symptom relapse in the trial’s off-treatment observation phase. Baseline samples were evaluable in 110/111 subjects who completed the randomized trial. MBP levels were higher in nonresponders (n = 36) than responders (704 vs. 373 cells/mm2; P = 0.007), but EOT3 and TRP levels were not statistically different. The combination of all three stains had an AUC of 0.66 to predict response. For complete histologic response, baseline TRP levels were higher in nonresponders (n = 69) than responders (370 vs. 268 mast cells/mm2; P = 0.01), with an AUC of 0.65. The AUC for endoscopic response was 0.68. Baseline staining did not predict symptom recurrence after remission. Pretreatment MBP, EOT3, and TRP levels were not strongly or consistently associated with histologic or endoscopic response to topical steroids. While elevated TRP levels may be associated with nonresponse compared with complete response, the magnitude and predictive utilities were modest. Novel methods for predicting steroid response are still required.

Download Full-text

Determination of a Treatment Response Threshold for the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score

Endoscopy ◽

10.1055/a-1675-7860 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Cary C. Cotton ◽

John T. Woosley ◽

Susie E. Moist ◽

Sarah J. McGee ◽

Alina Iuga ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Response ◽

Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Topical Steroid ◽

Mixture Modeling ◽

Response Threshold ◽

Confidence Limits ◽

Response Class ◽

High Power Field ◽

Histologic Response

Background and study aims: While endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are measured using the validated EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS), a threshold for treatment response has not been defined. We aimed to determine a cut-point for endoscopic response as measured by EREFS. Patients and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing budesonide slurry to swallowed fluticasone multidose inhaler for initial treatment of EoE. In the parent trial, EREFS was determined before and after treatment (score range 0-9), as were histologic findings and dysphagia symptoms. We performed tabular, flexible trend, and dependent mixture analyses of measures of treatment response to select the best clinical EREFS threshold. Results: In the 111 included subjects (mean age 39 years; 67% male; 96% white), an EREFS threshold of ≤2 was 80% sensitive (95% confidence limits 69 - 88%) and 83% specific (95% confidence limits 67 - 94%) for histologic response (peak of <15 eosinophils per high-power field). Flexible trend analysis and dependent mixture modeling similarly suggested a threshold of ≤2 best captured the correlation of EREFS with histologic and symptomatic measures. Dependent mixture modeling found near total membership in the response class at EREFS of 0 or 1 and >75% at EREFS of 2 or 3. Conclusions: An EREFS of ≤2 was the best clinical threshold for endoscopic response to topical steroid treatment and was consistent with clinical and histologic response. Therefore, future studies can report a binary outcome of endoscopic response when EREFS is two or less.

Download Full-text