Differences in perceived living group climate between youth with a Turkish/Moroccan and native Dutch background in residential youth care

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 105081
Author(s):  
R. Sevilir ◽  
G.H.P. van der Helm ◽  
J.J. Roest ◽  
M.H.M. Beld ◽  
R. Didden
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Levrouw ◽  
Rudi Roose ◽  
Peer van der Helm ◽  
Eefje Strijbosch ◽  
Stijn Vandevelde

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (13) ◽  
pp. 3991-4007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jantine Van den Tillaart ◽  
Ellen Eltink ◽  
Geert-Jan Stams ◽  
Peer Van der Helm ◽  
Inge Wissink

It is assumed that group climate can have an effect on aggressive behavior in adolescents living in residential facilities, but it is largely unknown whether there are climate differences between the various types of residential institutions, and whether group climate differently affects aggression incidents among adolescents placed in institutions that differ in levels of security (and openness). In current research, the differences in perception of group climate between open, semi-secure, and secure residential youth care facilities were examined as well as the association between group climate and aggression. In total, 159 adolescents (96 males, 63 females) completed the Prison Group Climate Instrument (PGCI), and (aggressive) incidents were recorded during a period of 3 months. Perception of group climate—including support from staff, group atmosphere among adolescents, possibilities for growth, and repression—did not differ between the various types of residential care, except for possibilities for growth. Adolescents in open and semi-secure institutions experienced more possibilities for growth than their peers in secure institutions. A more positive perception of group climate in open institutions proved to be related to less aggressive incidents at the living group. For semi-secure and secure institutions, no relation between group climate and aggression was found. Also, the longer adolescents stayed in residential youth care, the more aggressive incidents occurred.


2021 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 105628
Author(s):  
J. Sonderman ◽  
G.H.P. Van der Helm ◽  
C.H.Z. Kuiper ◽  
J.J. Roest ◽  
D. Van de Mheen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 946-971
Author(s):  
S. J. C. Höfte ◽  
C. H. Z. Kuiper ◽  
G. H. P. van der Helm ◽  
S. M. de Valk ◽  
G. J. J. M. Stams

Abstract This study examines the extent to which secure residential youth care in the Netherlands complies with children’s rights as laid down in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (uncrc) and the Dutch Youth Act. Residential group climate was measured with the Prison Group Climate Instrument (pgci), which assesses quality of group care from the perspective of the three basic needs for human self-determination: contact, autonomy and competence. Results indicate that children’s rights are a subsidiary issue in secure residential youth care in The Netherlands, because groups workers and staff have insufficient understanding of children’s rights and Dutch legislation on youth care. Dutch law allows secure facilities to make their own policy on youth care delivery, but it seems that policies are insufficiently explicit about children’s rights. Results of this study can be used to work on the fulfilment of children’s rights in secure residential youth care.


Author(s):  
Linda Vaskinn ◽  
Anneli Mellblom ◽  
Pamela M. Waaler ◽  
Oda Skagseth ◽  
Cato Bjørkli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document