scholarly journals Ilioinguinal approach versus Stoppa approach for open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jian Wang ◽  
Lu Li ◽  
Zhi-Hua Zhang ◽  
Yun-Xing Su ◽  
Xiu-Sheng Guo ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 832-837
Author(s):  
Dr. Kazim Mahmood ◽  
Dr. Darshan MS ◽  
Dr. Deepak Kumar Maley ◽  
Dr. Anas Ibrahim Delair ◽  
Dr. Ramsha Baig

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Srivastava ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Rajnish ◽  
Prasoon Kumar ◽  
Rehan Ul Haq ◽  
Ish Kumar Dhammi

Background: The fracture of the acetabulum is one of the most challenging fractures to manage and operate for orthopaedic surgeons, to get a good surgical outcome, anatomical reduction of fractures and reconstruction of the joint is of utmost importance. To achieve a good postoperative outcome an appropriate surgical approach is necessary to achieve an anatomical reduction of fractures and fewer complications. Objective: The current review aims to compare the outcomes of the ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced acetabular fractures by analyzing the evidence from the current literature. Methods: A systematic review of the literature will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary searches will be conducted on the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, using a pre-defined search strategy. The studies of any design in the English language will be included which compared the outcomes of the ilioinguinal and modified Stoppa approach for ORIF of displaced acetabular fractures and reported at least one outcome of interest. Studies that do not compare the outcomes of the ilioinguinal and modified Stoppa approach for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in adults (>18 years of age), case reports, conference abstracts, posters, book chapters, review articles, biomechanical studies, technical tips, cadaveric studies, and articles not in the English language will be excluded. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses will be done. Qualitative analysis will be done using appropriate tables and diagrams. Wherever feasible, quantitative analysis to be done with the appropriate software. The risk-of-bias assessment will be done using the MINORS tool for the non-randomized comparative studies, and The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool will be used for randomized control trials.


Author(s):  
Abdullah A. Ghaddaf ◽  
Ahmed S. Abdulhamid ◽  
Mohammed S. Alomari ◽  
Mohammed S. Alquhaibi ◽  
Abdulaziz A. Alshehri ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhao ◽  
Yuhui Zhang ◽  
Dongni Johansson ◽  
Xingyu Chen ◽  
Fang Zheng ◽  
...  

Objective. The study aims to compare minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture in elder patients. Method. PubMed, Medline, EMbase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wangfang, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals were searched to identify all relevant studies from inception to October 2016. Data were analyzed with Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manage 5.2. Results. A total of 630 patients from 8 publications were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that MIPO was superior to ORIF in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture in elder patients. It was reflected in reducing blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, or fracture healing time of the surgery and in improving recovery of muscle strength. Concerning complications, no significant difference was seen between MIPO and ORIF. Conclusion. The MIPO was more suitable than ORIF for treating proximal humeral fracture in elder patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilhan Alcelik ◽  
Carl Fenton ◽  
Gary Hannant ◽  
Musaab Abdelrahim ◽  
Charlie Jowett ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document