scholarly journals Radiological study of the Asian coracoid process and clavicle: Implications for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Loong Jen ◽  
Dong Hao Toon ◽  
Chung Hui Tan
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somsak Kuptniratsaikul ◽  
Natavut Prasertkul ◽  
Thun Itthipanichpong

Abstract Purposed: The purpose of this study was to measure the dimensions of the coracoid process from MRI imaging to find a safe area for drilling in arthroscopic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent MRI of the shoulder in our hospital between July 1, 2016 and June 31, 2018. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 20–60 years, BMI < 35 and height > 150 cm. Exclusion criteria included patients with a history of coracoid surgery, coracoid fracture or bone diseases affecting the coracoid bone. Measurement of the coracoid size was done in T1 MRI sagittal, coronal and axial views. Safe zone was defined as an area far from the medial and lateral base of the coracoid process, at least 5 mm each. Safe zone was then compared with the size of the drill hole to find an appropriately sized drill that would not violate the peripheral cortical coracoid bone.Results: Overall, 100 (male = 55, female = 45) patients were included in this study. Mean age, BMI and height of the patients were 48.5 years (range 22–58), 22.5 kg/m2 (range 18.5–28.4) and 164.5 cm (range 155–182), respectively. Mean safe area was 167.45 mm2 with males being slightly larger than females (male = 190.34 mm2, female = 140.99 mm2). The drill hole area was calculated by the radius (r) of the drill ( compared with the safe area. The maximum drill size for the men was 7 mm (154 mm2) and 6 mm (113.14 mm2) for women. However, we recommended a smaller drill size to account for any errors in position and technique.Conclusion: The safe area at the coracoid base was slightly larger in males as compared to females and the proper drill bit size was suggested to be less than 7 mm in males and 6 mm in females.


Injury ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 1314-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Xue ◽  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Tian-Sheng Zheng ◽  
Guo-Ying Zhang ◽  
Peng Fu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711988453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas N. Muench ◽  
Cameron Kia ◽  
Aulon Jerliu ◽  
Matthew Murphy ◽  
Daniel P. Berthold ◽  
...  

Background: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation is a common injury. The anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) technique is a viable treatment option, designed to restore the native joint anatomy. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing ACCR for the treatment of type III and V AC joint injuries with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on prospectively collected data. Patients who underwent ACCR for type III or V AC joint injuries between January 2003 and December 2015 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Constant-Murley (CM) score. To determine the clinical relevance of the ASES score, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were used. The pre- and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and side-to-side difference in the CCD were measured for radiographic analysis. Results: A total of 43 patients (22 acute, 21 chronic) were included in the study. The mean patient age was 43.4 ± 11.4 years, with a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (range, 2.0-7.5 years). With regard to the ASES score, 92% of patients achieved the MCID, 81% achieved the SCB, and 49% reached or exceeded the PASS. There was no significant difference when stratifying by type (III vs V) or chronicity (acute vs chronic) of injury (both P > .05). The Rowe score improved from 66.6 ± 15.9 preoperatively to 88.6 ± 12.3 postoperatively, the CM score from 61.6 ± 18.8 to 87.4 ± 15.1, and the SST score from 6.2 ± 3.6 to 9.4 ± 3.7 (all P < .001). The postoperative side-to-side difference in the CCD was 3.1 ± 2.7 mm, with type III injuries (2.4 ± 1.9 mm) showing significantly lower measurements compared with type V (4.2 ± 3.4 mm) ( P = .02). No significant trend was found between joint reduction and the improvement in clinical outcomes ( P > .05). Conclusion: Patients undergoing ACCR for acute and chronic type III and V AC joint injuries maintained significant improvement in clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Additionally, 81% of patients reached the SCB after surgical reconstruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document