Occipitocervical fusion: Fix to C2 or C3?

2014 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junwei Pan ◽  
Dageng Huang ◽  
Dingjun Hao ◽  
Yaling Zhao ◽  
Baorong He ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smruti Patel ◽  
Rafael Avendano-Pradel ◽  
Sophie D’herbemont ◽  
David Ceja ◽  
Diego Martinez ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 618-621
Author(s):  
Ginryu Fukumoto ◽  
Yoshihiro Ryoki ◽  
Toshiyuki Ohnishi ◽  
Kosei Ijiri ◽  
Shunji Matsunaga ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e16
Author(s):  
Yuki Tanaka ◽  
Kei Watanabe ◽  
Keiichi Katsumi ◽  
Masayuki Ohashi ◽  
Keisuke Nagasaki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Tang ◽  
Guang Zhou Li ◽  
Min Kang ◽  
Ye Hui Liao ◽  
Qiang Tang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 350
Author(s):  
Midori Miyagi ◽  
Hiroshi Takahashi ◽  
Hideki Sekiya ◽  
Satoru Ebihara

Background: Dysphagia is one of the most serious complications of occipitocervical fusion (OCF). The previous studies have shown that postoperative cervical alignment, documented with occipito (O)-C2 angles, C2-C6 angles, and pharyngeal inlet angles (PIA), impacted the incidence of postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing OCF. Here, we investigated the relationship of preoperative versus postoperative cervical alignment on the incidence of postoperative dysphagia after OCF. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data/medical charts for 22 patients following OCF (2006– 2019). The O-C2 angles, C2-C6 angles, PIA, and narrowest pharyngeal airway spaces (nPAS) were assessed using plain lateral radiographs of the cervical spine before and after the surgery. The severity of dysphagia was assessed with the functional oral intake scale (FOIS) levels as documented in medical charts; based on this, patients were classified into the nondysphagia (FOIS: 7) versus dysphagia (FOIS: 1–6) groups. Results: Seven patients (35%) experienced dysphagia after OCF surgery. Preoperative PIA and nPAS were smaller in the dysphagia group. Spearman rank correlation showed a positive correlation between preoperative PIA and FOIS and between preoperative nPAS and FOIS. Conclusion: This study suggests that preoperative cervical alignment may best predict the incidence of postoperative dysphagia after OCF.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-705
Author(s):  
Masashi Wakasugi ◽  
Kei Watanabe ◽  
Toru Hirano ◽  
Keiichi Katsumi ◽  
Masayuki Ohashi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Giusy Guzzi ◽  
Attilio Della Torre ◽  
Donatella Gabriele ◽  
Giorgio Volpentesta ◽  
Domenico Chirchiglia ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ns Alshafai ◽  
M Dibenedetto

Background: Occipitocervical fusion (OCF) using screws and rods offers immediate stability and an high fusion rates. However, multiple cranial fixation points are required in order to compensate for the poor bony purchase. Methods: The aim of this study was to compare the occipital condyle screw with the standard OCF techniques as well as to compare available techniques of the occipital condyle screw insertion. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive “Medline” and “Web of science” database search was performed. Cadaveric, radiographic and case studies were included. Results: The occipital condyle screw in comparison to the occipital plate enables an increased screw length, greater screw pullout strength, lower profile of the hardware and extended grafting surface. Both constructs have similar biomechanical properties (range of motion restriction, stiffness). Proximity of the vertebral artery and hypoglossal canal presents the greatest technical challenge of occipital condyle screw. Four surgical techniques with different entry points, cranial-caudal and medial angulations were described. None of these techniques is superior to the other. Conclusions: Occipital condyle screw is a viable alternative to standard OCF techniques. Challenges exist due to the proximity of the vital anatomical structures. Choice between four available techniques depends on unique patient’s anatomy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document