Postoperative dysphagia caused by a delay in mandibular fracture treatment in a patient with severe intellectual disability: a case report

Background The postoperative complications of mandibular fracture include malocclusion, infection, nonunion, osteomyelitis, and sensorial mental nerve dysfunction. However, there are no reports regarding postoperative dysphagia as a complication of mandibular fracture. Herein, we report a rare case of postoperative dysphagia caused by delayed mandibular fracture treatment in a patient with severe intellectual disability. Case presentation A 46-year-old Japanese male patient with severe intellectual disability fell down and struck his chin. The patient was referred to our department 10 days after the accident. Upon examination, he could not close his mouth because of severe left mandibular body fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation was performed under general anesthesia 16 days after sustaining the injury, and normal occlusion was eventually achieved. However, the patient could not swallow well a day after surgery. He was then diagnosed with postoperative dysphagia caused by disuse atrophy of muscles for swallowing based on videoendoscopic examination findings. Adequate dysphagia rehabilitation could not be facilitated because of the patient’s mental status. Postoperative dysphagia did not improve 21 days after surgery. Therefore, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was required. Conclusions The treatment course of the patient had two important implications. First, postoperative dysphagia caused by disuse atrophy may occur if treatment is delayed in severe mandibular body fracture. Second, in particular, if a patient with severe intellectual disability develops postoperative dysphagia caused by disuse atrophy, adequate dysphagia rehabilitation cannot be facilitated, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy may be required. Therefore, early open reduction and internal fixation is required for mandibular fracture in a patient with severe intellectual disability.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Zero-P System for Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Meta-Analysis

Objective. The current study aimed to explore the efficacy of Zero profile intervertebral fusion system (Zero-P) and traditional anterior plate cage system (PC) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Further, the present study evaluated effects of the treatments on medical security, height of intervertebral disc, adjacent-level ossification development (ALOD), and adjacent segmentation disease (ASD) through a systematic retrospective analysis. Methods. Studies on Zero-P system and traditional anterior plate cage system for ACDF in the treatment of CSM were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent researchers screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the current study. RevMan5.3 software was used for meta-analysis following the guidelines of Cochrane collaboration network. Cervical curvature, interbody fusion rate, preoperative and postoperative disc height index (DHI), fusion cage sinking rate, postoperative dysphagia, ASD, ALOD, and loosening of screw were compared between the two groups. Results. A total of 17 literatures were included in the present study, including 6 randomized controlled trials and 11 observational studies. The studies comprised a total of 1204 patients with CSM, including 605 patients in the Zero-P system group (Zero-P group) and 599 patients in the traditional animal plate cage group (PC group). Results of this meta-analysis showed that postoperative dysphagia [OR = 0.40, CI (0.28, 95% 0.58), P < 0.00001], ALOD [OR = 0.09, CI (0.02, 95% 0.39), P = 0.001], ASD [OR = 0.42, CI (0.20, 95% 0.86), P = 0.02], and screw loosening [OR = 0.20, CI (0.08, 95% 0.52), P = 0.0009] of the Zero-P group were significantly lower compared with the PC group. On the other hand, preoperative cervical curvature [WMD = −0.23, CI (−1.38, 95% 0.92), P = 0.69], postoperative cervical curvature [WMD = −0.38, CI (−1.77, 95% 1.01), P = 0.59], cage sinking rate [OR = 1.41, CI [0.52, 95% 3.82], P = 0.50], intervertebral fusion rate [OR = 0.76, CI (0.27, 95% 2.48), P = 0.38], preoperative DHI [WMD = −0.04, CI (−0.14, 95% 0.22), P = 0.65], and postoperative DHI [WMD = 0.06, CI (−0.22, 95% 0.34), P = 0.675] were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion. It was evident that the Zero-P system used in ACDF is superior compared with the traditional anterior plate cage system in postoperative dysphagia, avoiding ALOD, ASD, and screw loosening.

Esophageal Manometry Testing and Anti-Reflux Surgery: The Preoperative Necessity and Prognostic Utility

Manometric assessment of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and esophageal body is the key to a better understanding of the mechanics of antireflux surgery (ARS) and maximizing its benefits while minimizing adverse outcomes. However, there is an attitude of uncertainty regarding the necessity of esophageal motility prior to ARS among some surgeons. This evidence-based review highlights the critical role of manometry in the preoperative workup for patients undergoing ARS. It also discusses how manometry can detect findings associated with favorable outcomes or the risk of postoperative dysphagia. Manometric data can be used for risk stratification and the prediction of outcomes, aiding the surgeon in matching an operation to the specific physiology of each individual patient.

The Relevance of Ineffective Esophageal Motility to Surgical Practice

Foregut surgery is often complicated by postoperative dysphagia. Preoperative esophageal manometry has been used to counsel patients and to guide choice of operation to minimize dysphagia outcomes. Uncertainty surrounds the optimal surgical management of patients with disordered motility. While treatment protocols are generally accepted for the disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow, surgery choice in the presence of disorders of peristalsis, particularly ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), is less clear. With the diagnosis of IEM, provocation testing is being utilized to predict postoperative dysphagia and to guide management, though evidence is not yet sufficient to allow for strong recommendations.

Role of preoperative cervical alignment on postoperative dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion

Background: Dysphagia is one of the most serious complications of occipitocervical fusion (OCF). The previous studies have shown that postoperative cervical alignment, documented with occipito (O)-C2 angles, C2-C6 angles, and pharyngeal inlet angles (PIA), impacted the incidence of postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing OCF. Here, we investigated the relationship of preoperative versus postoperative cervical alignment on the incidence of postoperative dysphagia after OCF. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data/medical charts for 22 patients following OCF (2006– 2019). The O-C2 angles, C2-C6 angles, PIA, and narrowest pharyngeal airway spaces (nPAS) were assessed using plain lateral radiographs of the cervical spine before and after the surgery. The severity of dysphagia was assessed with the functional oral intake scale (FOIS) levels as documented in medical charts; based on this, patients were classified into the nondysphagia (FOIS: 7) versus dysphagia (FOIS: 1–6) groups. Results: Seven patients (35%) experienced dysphagia after OCF surgery. Preoperative PIA and nPAS were smaller in the dysphagia group. Spearman rank correlation showed a positive correlation between preoperative PIA and FOIS and between preoperative nPAS and FOIS. Conclusion: This study suggests that preoperative cervical alignment may best predict the incidence of postoperative dysphagia after OCF.