Intraventricular hemorrhage related to AVM rupture: Description, outcomes and impact of intraventricular fibrinolysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 92-96
Author(s):  
Vianney Gilard ◽  
Thomas Metayer ◽  
Clement Gakuba ◽  
Olivier Langlois ◽  
François Proust ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (06) ◽  
pp. 745-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Abdelmalik ◽  
Wendy Ziai

AbstractSpontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most common cause of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in adults. Complicating approximately 40% of ICH cases, IVH adds to the morbidity and mortality of this often fatal form of stroke. It is also a severity factor that complicates subarachnoid hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury, along with other less common causes of intracranial bleeding. Medical and surgical interventions to date have focused on limiting ICH and IVH expansion, controlling intracranial pressure, and relieving obstructive hydrocephalus. The placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) can achieve the latter two goals but has not demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes beyond mortality reduction. More recently, intraventricular fibrinolysis, utilizing the EVD, has gained interest as a safe and potentially effective method to maintain catheter patency and facilitate hematoma removal. A recent phase III clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of intraventricular alteplase versus intraventricular saline showed a mortality benefit, but failed to meet the primary endpoint of significant functional improvement. However, planned subgroup analysis focusing on patients with IVH volume > 20 mL, and those with IVH removal > 85% suggest that significant functional benefits may be attainable with this therapy. The practice of intraventricular fibrinolysis for spontaneous IVH is not the standard of care; however, based on 20 years of experience, it meets thresholds as a safe intervention, and in those patients with a high burden of intraventricular blood, aggressive clearance may lead to improved quality of life in survivors of this morbid syndrome.


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-66
Author(s):  
S. Castaño Ávila ◽  
E. Corral Lozano ◽  
A. Vallejo De La Cueva ◽  
J. Maynar Moliner ◽  
A. Martín López ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged D. Fam ◽  
Alice Pang ◽  
Hussein A. Zeineddine ◽  
Steven Mayo ◽  
Agnieszka Stadnik ◽  
...  

Background: Spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality despite critical care and other advances. An important step in clinical management is to confirm/rule out an underlying vascular lesion, which influences further treatment, potential for further bleeding, and prognosis. Our aim is to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between IVH patients with and without an underlying vascular lesion, and among cohorts with different vascular lesions. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data of IVH patients screened for eligibility as part of the Clot Lysis: Evaluation Accelerated Resolution of IVH Phase III (CLEAR III) clinical trial. The trial adopted a structured screening process to systematically exclude patients with an underlying vascular lesion as the etiology of IVH. We collected age, sex, ethnicity, and primary diagnosis on these cases and vascular lesions were categorized prospectively as aneurysm, vascular malformation (arteriovenous malformation, dural arteriovenous fistula, and cavernoma), Moyamoya disease, or other vascular lesion. We excluded cases <18 or >80 years of age. Baseline characteristics were compared between the CLEAR group (IVH screened without vascular lesion) and the group of IVH patients screened and excluded from CLEAR because of an identified vascular lesion. We further analyzed the differential demographic and clinical characteristics among subcohorts with different vascular lesions. Results: A total of 10,538 consecutive IVH cases were prospectively screened for the trial between 2011 and 2015. Out of these, 496 cases (4.7%) screened negative for underlying vascular lesion, met the inclusion criteria, and were enrolled in the trial (no vascular etiology group); and 1,205 cases (11.4%) were concurrently screened and excluded from the trial because of a demonstrated underlying vascular lesion (vascular etiology group). Cases with vascular lesion were less likely to be >45 years of age (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20-0.40), African-American (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.31), or male gender (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.60), and more likely to present with primary IVH (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.37-2.51) compared to those with no vascular etiology (p < 0.001). Other demographic factors were associated with specific vascular lesion etiologies. A combination of demographic features increases the association with the absence of vascular lesion, but not with absolute reliability (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.06-0.17, p < 0.001). Conclusion: An underlying vascular lesion as etiology of IVH cannot be excluded solely by demographic parameters in any patient. Some form of vascular imaging is necessary in screening patients before contemplating interventions like intraventricular fibrinolysis, where safety may be impacted by the presence of vascular lesion.


Stroke ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 2776-2781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gaberel ◽  
Cristian Magheru ◽  
Jean-Jacques Parienti ◽  
Hagen Bernhard Huttner ◽  
Denis Vivien ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephane Litrico ◽  
Fabien Almairac ◽  
Thomas Gaberel ◽  
Rohan Ramakrishna ◽  
Denys Fontaine ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document