Correlates of Deep Brain Stimulation Consensus Conference Decision to Treat Primary Dystonia

Author(s):  
Lindsay Niccolai ◽  
Stephen L. Aita ◽  
Harrison C. Walker ◽  
Victor A. Del Bene ◽  
Adam Gerstenecker ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 201-204
Author(s):  
Kyle T. Mitchell ◽  
Kristen A. Dodenhoff ◽  
Philip A. Starr ◽  
Jill L. Ostrem

DYT1 dystonia is a primary dystonia with potential for significant symptomatic improvement after bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi). GPi is the historical target of choice for this disease. This chapter presents a case of an adolescent with disabling generalized DYT1 dystonia who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS as part of a prospective clinical trial. While limb and cervical dystonia dramatically improved with DBS, programming was limited by stimulation-induced bilateral limb dyskinesia, including in the left arm, which was previously unaffected by dystonia. After years of evolving symptoms and complex programming, bilateral interleaved settings using both a contact in motor STN and the most dorsal DBS contact in the zona incerta resulted in sustained, near-complete resolution of dystonia without side effects. This case illustrates the use of the STN as an effective DBS target for primary dystonia, although complex programming was necessary to mitigate stimulation-induced dyskinesia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jetan H. Badhiwala ◽  
Brij Karmur ◽  
Lior M. Elkaim ◽  
Naif M. Alotaibi ◽  
Benjamin R. Morgan ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEAlthough deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an accepted treatment for childhood dystonia, there is significant heterogeneity in treatment response and few data are available to identify ideal surgical candidates.METHODSData were derived from a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of DBS for dystonia in children that was previously published. Outcomes were assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale for movement (BFMDRS-M) and for disability (BFMDRS-D). The authors used partial least squares, bootstrapping, and permutation statistics to extract patterns of contributions of specific preoperative characteristics to relationship with distinct outcomes, in all patients and in patients with primary and secondary dystonia separately.RESULTSOf 301 children undergoing DBS for dystonia, 167 had primary dystonia, 125 secondary dystonia, and 9 myoclonus dystonia. Three dissociable preoperative phenotypes (latent variables) were identified and associated with the following: 1) BFMDRS-M at last follow-up; 2) relative change in BFMDRS-M score; and 3) relative change in BFMDRS-D score. The phenotype of patients with secondary dystonia, with a high BFMDRS-M score and truncal involvement, undergoing DBS at a younger age, was associated with a worse postoperative BFMDRS-M score. Children with primary dystonia involving the trunk had greater improvement in BFMDRS-M and -D scores. Those with primary dystonia of shorter duration and proportion of life with disease, undergoing globus pallidus DBS, had greater improvements in BFMDRS-D scores at long-term follow-up.CONCLUSIONSIn a comprehensive, data-driven, multivariate analysis of DBS for childhood dystonia, the authors identified novel and dissociable patient phenotypes associated with distinct outcomes. The findings of this report may inform surgical candidacy for DBS.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazem A. Eltahawy ◽  
Jean Saint-Cyr ◽  
Nir Giladi ◽  
Anthony E. Lang ◽  
Andres M. Lozano

Abstract OBJECTIVE The response of patients with dystonia to pallidal procedures is not well understood. In this study, we assessed the postoperative outcome of patients with primary and secondary dystonia undergoing pallidotomy or pallidal deep brain stimulation. METHODS Fifteen patients with dystonia had pallidal surgery (lesions or deep brain stimulation). These included nine patients with primary dystonia (generalized and cervical dystonias) and six with secondary dystonia (generalized, segmental, and hemidystonias). There were nine male patients and six female patients. The mean age at onset was 21 years for primary dystonia and 18 years for secondary dystonia. The primary outcome measure was a Global Outcome Scale score for dystonia at 6 months after surgery. Other outcome measures were the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale and Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale scores. RESULTS The mean Global Outcome Scale score at 6 months for patients with primary dystonia was 3 (improvement in both movement disorder and function). In contrast, patients with secondary dystonia had a mean score of 0.83 (mild or no improvement in movement disorder with no functional improvement). All patients with primary dystonia had normal brains by magnetic resonance imaging, whereas five of six patients with secondary dystonia had basal ganglia abnormalities on their magnetic resonance imaging scans. CONCLUSION This study indicates that primary dystonia responds much better than secondary dystonia to pallidal procedures. We could not distinguish a difference in efficacy between pallidotomy and pallidal deep brain stimulation. The presence of basal ganglia abnormalities on the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan is an indicator of a lesser response to pallidal interventions for dystonia.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2101-2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gun-Marie Hariz ◽  
Patricia Limousin ◽  
Stephen Tisch ◽  
Marjan Jahanshahi ◽  
Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund

2020 ◽  
pp. 185-194
Author(s):  
Mitesh Lotia

The past two decades have revealed substantial benefits of bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with medication-refractory primary dystonia. There is a growing body of evidence now describing not only short-term but also long-term benefits up to 10 years following DBS. These benefits are often sustained, requiring minimal long-term modification. Pallidal programming for dystonia may be complex owing to the gradual onset of benefits and often delayed development of side effects. There is a relative scarcity of evidence-based recommendations for standardized programming methods. This chapter reviews essential factors to consider for appropriate patient selection and discusses strategies for initial and follow-up programming. Finally, the chapter describes the potential short-term and long-term adverse effects, while considering various strategies to mitigate them.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill L. Ostrem ◽  
Leslie C. Markun ◽  
Graham A. Glass ◽  
Caroline A. Racine ◽  
Monica M. Volz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document