Increased baseline temperature improves the acquisition of contact heat evoked potentials after spinal cord injury

2012 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 582-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L.K. Kramer ◽  
J. Haefeli ◽  
A. Curt ◽  
J.D. Steeves
Spinal Cord ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Opsommer ◽  
Natalya Korogod ◽  
Lenka Stockinger ◽  
Gunther Landmann

Abstract Study design An experimental study. Objectives To investigate the changes in somatosensory functions using the combined application of quantitative sensory testing (QST), contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) studies in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in relation to neuropathic pain (NeP). Setting Centre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland. Methods Individuals with SCI were compared: 12 with NeP (SCI NeP) and 12 without NeP (SCI no NeP). Tools used were QST, CHEPs, LEPs and self-reported questionnaires. Tests were applied to the control (hand) and test (dermatome of altered sensation) sites, and compared to the able-bodied group. Results QST, LEPs and CHEPs assessments showed abnormalities both on the test and control sites, which did not differ between the groups with SCI. QST showed higher prevalence of allodynia in SCI NeP. CHEPs and LEPs demonstrated diminished amplitudes in both groups with SCI in comparison to able-bodied individuals. Only reaction time (RT) analysis revealed the difference of SCI NeP from the other two groups, expressed in partially preserved responses to the laser C-fibre stimulations. Conclusions Combination of assessments in our study allowed to examine spinothalamic and dorsal column functions in individuals with SCI. Changes in QST, CHEPs and LEPs were detected below the level of injury independent of NeP and at the control site indicating modifications in sensory processing rostral to the spinal lesion. Analysis of RT during laser stimulation could be an essential component when evaluating the somatosensory functions related to NeP in persons with SCI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-354
Author(s):  
Radha Korupolu ◽  
Argyrios Stampas ◽  
Mani Singh ◽  
Ping Zhou ◽  
Gerard Francisco

Background: Electrophysiological measures are being increasingly utilized due to their ability to provide objective measurements with minimal bias and to detect subtle changes with quantitative data on neural function. Heterogeneous reporting of trial outcomes limits effective interstudy comparison and optimization of treatment. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to describe the reporting of electrophysiological outcome measures in spinal cord injury (SCI) clinical trials in order to inform a subsequent consensus study. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Adult human SCI clinical trials published in English between January 1, 2008 and September 15, 2018 with at least one electrophysiological outcome measure were eligible. Findings were reviewed by all authors to create a synthesis narrative describing each outcome measure. Results: Sixty-four SCI clinical trials were included in this review. Identified electrophysiological outcomes included electromyography activity (44%), motor evoked potentials (33%), somatosensory evoked potentials (33%), H-reflex (20%), reflex electromyography activity (11%), nerve conduction studies (9%), silent period (3%), contact heat evoked potentials (2%), and sympathetic skin response (2%). Heterogeneity was present in regard to both methods of measurement and reporting of electrophysiological outcome measures. Conclusion: This review demonstrates need for the development of a standardized reporting set for electrophysiological outcome measures. Limitations of this review include exclusion of non-English publications, studies more than 10 years old, and an inability to assess methodological quality of primary studies due to a lack of guidelines on reporting of systematic reviews of outcome measures.


2010 ◽  
Vol 193 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrivats Iyer ◽  
Anil Maybhate ◽  
Alessandro Presacco ◽  
Angelo H. All

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1159-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gracee Agrawal ◽  
David Sherman ◽  
Anil Maybhate ◽  
Michael Gorelik ◽  
Douglas A. Kerr ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Balbinot ◽  
Guijin Li ◽  
Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan ◽  
Rainer Abel ◽  
Doris Maier ◽  
...  

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) severely impacts widespread bodily functions with extensive impairments for individuals, who prioritize regaining hand function. Although prior work has focused on the recovery at the person-level, the factors determining the recovery potential of individual muscles are poorly understood. There is a need for changing this paradigm in the field by moving beyond person-level classification of residual strength and sacral sparing to a muscle-specific analysis with a focus on the role of corticospinal tract (CST) sparing. The most striking part of human evolution involved the development of dextrous hand use with a respective expansion of the sensorimotor cortex controlling hand movements, which, because of the extensive CST projections, may constitute a drawback after SCI. Here, we investigated the muscle-specific natural recovery after cervical SCI in 748 patients from the European Multicenter Study about SCI (EMSCI), one of the largest datasets analysed to date. All participants were assessed within the first 4 weeks after SCI and re-assessed at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Subsets of individuals underwent electrophysiological multimodal evaluations to discern CST and lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity [motor evoked potentials (MEP): N = 203; somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP): N = 313; nerve conduction studies (NCS): N = 280]. We show the first evidence of the importance of CST sparing for proportional recovery in SCI, which is known in stroke survivors to represent the biological limits of structural and functional plasticity. In AIS D, baseline strength is a good predictor of segmental muscle strength recovery, while the proportionality in relation to baseline strength is lower for AIS B/C and breaks for AIS A. More severely impaired individuals showed non-linear and more variable recovery profiles, especially for hand muscles, while measures of CST sparing (by means of MEP) improved the prediction of hand muscle strength recovery. Therefore, assessment strategies for muscle-specific motor recovery in acute SCI improve by accounting for CST sparing and complement gross person-level predictions. The latter is of paramount importance for clinical trial outcomes and to target neurorehabilitation of upper limb function, where any single muscle function impacts the outcome of independence in cervical SCI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document