Adapting pharmacoeconomic data and methods to extend the postpublication utility of analyses

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-193
Author(s):  
Alan Lyles
1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S27-S29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Graves

Two pharmacoeconomic studies on the treatment of acute seizures have been conducted. In 1991, Kriel and colleagues surveyed parents of children with a history of cluster seizures, prolonged seizures, or status epilepticus who had been instructed in the use of rectal diazepam. A comparison of data before instruction with data after instruction showed a reduced need for emergency department visits with rectal diazepam. Instruction thus provided a pharmacoeconomic benefit, despite the cost of the product. In 1996, Marchetti and coworkers found that intravenous fosphenytoin was associated with fewer adverse events than intravenous phenytoin. Fosphenytoin thus reduced the need for adverse event management and provided a substantial pharmacoeconomic benefit, despite its higher cost, compared with phenytoin. This study had a number of limitations, however, and hospital pharmacists remain resistant to the use of fosphenytoin. Additional studies may provide more pharmacoeconomic data to support the greater use of fosphenytoin in the treatment of acute pediatric seizures. (J Child Neurol 1998;13(Suppl 1):S27-S29).


2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-273
Author(s):  
Eric W. Mueller ◽  
Bradley A. Boucher

Fosphenytoin is a parenteral phosphate ester prodrug of phenytoin developed to overcome the limitations associated with parenteral administration of phenytoin. Despite potential clinical advantages, pharmacoeconomic concerns have prevented widespread substitution of parenteral phenytoin with fosphenytoin. The purposes of this descriptive review are to (1) highlight recent clinical and pharmacoeconomic data regarding the therapeutic decision to use phenytoin or fosphenytoin for the parenteral management of acute seizures, and (2) discuss the implications of fosphenytoin use in neonatal and pediatric patients. Supporting recent, multidisciplinary, consensus guidelines, it is our opinion that each patient should be evaluated individually to identify those who will benefit most from fosphenytoin. Such patients may include those without intravenous or enteral access, those requiring parenteral therapy with tenuous peripheral intravenous access, and pediatric and neonatal patients. Additionally, institution-specific cost analyses should be done to assure the most appropriate agent is being used, while being sensitive to the potential disparate risk profiles between patient populations. Until the issues of safety relative to cost are objectively ameliorated, individual clinicians will likely use their own experience to dictate the place of fosphenytoin in their respective practices.


2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (15) ◽  
pp. 1441-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Folakemi T. Odedina ◽  
Johanna Sullivan ◽  
Rowena Nash ◽  
C. Denise Clemmons

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document