A health-economic evaluation of disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from the German societal perspective

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Nuijten ◽  
Thomas Mittendorf
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Societal Perspective ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

scholarly journals When to Initiate Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Adults?

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Alkhawajah ◽  
Joel Oger
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Major Question ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

For patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Scierosis Beta Interfaerons and Glatiramer Acetate were the first to be licensed for treatment. This review deals with one major question: when to initiate therapy? Through exploring the unique characteristics of the disease and treatement we suggest an approach that should be helpful in the process of decision-making.

The Case for Early Diagnosis and Treatment In Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Rudick
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Tissue Injury ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Neurologic Disability ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract The emergence of partially effective disease-modifying drugs for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) has raised important questions. Which patients with RR-MS should be started on disease-modifying drugs? Can some patients be observed without treatment? Treatment decisions are difficult in part because currently available drugs must be administered by injections, and the drugs are expensive. Emerging research findings support the view that most people diagnosed with RR-MS are at risk for irreversible brain tissue injury and resultant neurologic disability. Importantly, the pathologic process is active during the early stages in many RR-MS patients who appear clinically stable. These findings provide a rationale for proactively treating patients with RR-MS early in their disease course with disease-modifying drugs in order to suppress disease activity, minimize tissue injury, and prevent disability at a later stage. Evidence in support of this approach is reviewed in this report, as are practical issues related to the use of disease-modifying drugs in RR-MS patients.

Effect of disease-modifying drugs on cortical lesions and atrophy in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Calabrese ◽  
V Bernardi ◽  
M Atzori ◽  
I Mattisi ◽  
A Favaretto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Grey Matter ◽  
Reference Population ◽  
Cortical Atrophy ◽  
Cortical Lesions ◽  
Disease Modifying Drugs ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Objective: To measure the effects of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) on the development of cortical lesions (CL) and cortical atrophy in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: RRMS patients ( n = 165) were randomized to subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) beta-1a (44 mcg three times weekly), intramuscular (im) IFN beta-1a (30 mcg weekly) or glatiramer acetate (GA; 20 mg daily). The reference population comprised 50 untreated patients. Clinical and MRI examinations were performed at baseline, 12 months and 24 months. Results: One hundred and forty-one treated patients completed the study. After 12 months, 37/50 (74%) of untreated patients developed ≥1 new CL (mean 1.6), compared with 30/47 (64%) of im IFN beta-1a-treated patients (mean 1.2, p = 0.021), 24/48 (50%) of GA-treated patients (mean 0.8, p = 0.001) and 12/46 (26%) of sc IFN beta-1a-treated patients (mean 0.4, p < 0.001). After 24 months, ≥1 new CL was observed in 41/50 (82%) of untreated (mean 3.0), 34/47 (72%) of im IFN beta-1a-treated (mean 1.6, p < 0.001), 30/48 (62%) of GA-treated (mean 1.3, p < 0.001) and 24/46 (52%) of sc IFN beta-1a-treated patients (mean 0.8, p < 0.001). Mean grey matter fraction decrease in DMD-treated patients at 24 months ranged from 0.7 to 0.8 versus 1.0 in untreated patients ( p = 0.023). Conclusions: Disease-modifying drugs significantly decreased new CL development and cortical atrophy progression compared with untreated patients, with faster and more pronounced effects seen with sc IFN beta-1a than with im IFN beta-1a or GA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document