Comparison of outcomes after second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation versus donor lymphocyte infusion in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eshrak Al-Shaibani ◽  
Rhida Bautista ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Dennis D. Kim ◽  
Auro Viswabandya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Donor Lymphocyte Infusion ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Transplant Patients

scholarly journals Understanding the Process and Challenges for Return-to-Work Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from a Musculoskeletal Perspective: A Narrative Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jaleel Mohammed ◽  
Anne Gonzales ◽  
Hadeel R. Bakhsh ◽  
Volkova Alisa Georgievna ◽  
Jayanti Rai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Functional Restoration ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Job Evaluation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Transplant Patients

The current paper seeks to inform healthcare professionals on how adapting various components of return to work (RTW) programs that are already in use by other musculoskeletal rehabilitation settings can help optimize return to work process for patients with or without musculoskeletal manifestations, posthematopoietic cell transplantation. Since there is no universally agreed RTW structure for hematopoietic cell transplant patients, a narrative approach has been taken utilizing evidence from the existing musculoskeletal return to work assessment publications to help draw parallel for the hematopoietic cell transplant patients. Databases were searched including PUBMED, CINHAL, AMED, SCOPUS, and Cochrane using keywords RTW, functional restoration program, hematopoietic cell transplant, bone marrow transplant, stem cell transplant, and musculoskeletal functional assessment. The authors have managed to outline and propose a structured RTW assessment and monitoring program which can aid in getting patients back to employment by utilizing the functional capacity and job evaluation to help hematopoietic cell transplantation patients reintegrate socially. Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant require additional support and a robust assessment system to allow safe RTW. The proposed model of RTW assessment can prove to be beneficial in helping patients return to work safely. Clinical Significance. To acknowledge the individuality in functional limitation is important in determining not only the rehab needs but also the RTW capabilities. The proposed RTW plan not only promotes an individualized approach to patients but also provides a structure for return to work assessments for hematopoietic cell transplantation patients, thus, eliminating the need for guess work by healthcare professionals. In line with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) recommendations, a RTW assessment combined with a job evaluation helps healthcare professionals and stakeholders to understand the unique challenges and strengths of a patient and thereby design an individualized therapy approach.

scholarly journals Management of Herpesvirus Infections in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-21
Author(s):  
Jan Styczynski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cellular Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Preventive Strategy ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Screening Assay ◽  
Specific Level

Following primary infection, herpesviruses establish latency in infected individuals in the host cells and may reactivate upon external stimuli and during periods of immunosuppression. The objective of this paper was to the present current strategies on preventive and therapeutic management of infections with herpesviruses in recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Strategies of antiviral management include prophylaxis, pre-emptive treatment and targeted treatment. Empirical therapy is not used in antiviral strategies. Prophylaxis can be done at universal (preventive strategy) and specific level. Universal prophylaxis includes non-pharmacologic methods of prevention of infection or reactivation. Risk-adapted specific prophylaxis includes use of specific antivirals or cellular therapy or other specific methods in order to prevent specific infection, in high-risk groups. Pre-emptive therapy means use of therapeutic approaches in asymptomatic infection, detected by a screening assay. Targeted therapy is used in established specific viral end-organ infections. The following sections of the paper refer to prophylaxis and treatment strategies, respectively, against CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8 after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

scholarly journals Steroid-dependent acute GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: risk factors and clinical outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1352-1359
Author(s):  
Najla El Jurdi ◽  
Ahmad Rayes ◽  
Margaret L. MacMillan ◽  
Shernan G. Holtan ◽  
Todd E. DeFor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Steroid Dependent ◽  
Steroid Sensitive

Abstract Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) has various risk factors and outcomes. We defined distinct aGVHD treatment response groups based on response to first-line corticosteroids: steroid sensitive (SS), steroid resistant (SR), and the rarely studied steroid dependent (SD) aGVHD. In 1143 consecutive adult and pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, 385 (34%) developed aGVHD, with 10% having SS aGVHD, 9% SD aGVHD, and 14% SR aGVHD. The only factor significantly associated with SD in comparison with SS was older age (odds ratio [OR], 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-11.3, when comparing 18- to 60-year-olds with <18-year-olds). Factors significantly associated with SR in comparison with SS were unrelated donor (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4) and Minnesota high-risk aGVHD (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.6). SR aGVHD was independently associated with higher risk for 2-year overall mortality (hazards ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM; HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9). SS and SD GVHD groups had similar overall survival and NRM. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was highest in the SD group, followed by the SR and SS groups (46%, 41%, and 29%, respectively). SD and SS GVHD had similar prognoses, both markedly better than those of the SR groups.

scholarly journals Contribution of Sleep Disruption and Sedentary Behavior to Fatigue in Survivors of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley M Nelson ◽  
Kelly A Hyland ◽  
Brent Small ◽  
Brittany Kennedy ◽  
Asmita Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sedentary Behavior ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Sleep Efficiency ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Disturbed Sleep ◽  
Objectively Measured

Abstract Background Fatigue is a prominent quality of life concern among recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Purpose The present study investigated whether objectively measured sleep efficiency and sedentary behavior are related to greater reports of fatigue. Methods Eighty-two allogeneic HCT recipients who were 1–5 years post-transplant and returning for a follow-up visit participated (age M = 56, 52% female, 56% leukemia). They wore an actigraph assessing sleep efficiency and sedentary behavior for one week and completed an electronic log assessing fatigue each evening during the same period. Results Twenty-six percent of patients reported clinically meaningful fatigue. On average, fatigue was mild (M = 2.5 on 0–10 scale, SD = 2.0), sleep was disturbed (sleep efficiency M = 78.9%, SD = 8.9), and patients spent the majority of time in sedentary (M = 55.4%, SD = 10.2) or light (M = 35.9%, SD = 8.6) activity. Multilevel model analysis of between-person differences indicated that patients who experienced less efficient sleep the previous evening provided greater evening reports of average fatigue, b = –0.06, 95% CI (–0.11, –0.01). Similarly, within-person analyses indicated that when patients experienced less efficient sleep the previous evening or were more sedentary as compared to their average, they provided greater evening reports of average fatigue, b = –0.02, 95% CI (–0.05, –0.004); b = 4.46, 95% CI (1.95, 6.97), respectively. Conclusions Findings demonstrate that poor sleep and daily sedentary behavior are related to evening reports of fatigue and should be considered modifiable targets for intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document