Respiratory Movement of Upper Abdominal Organs and its Effect on Radiotherapy Planning in Pancreatic Cancer1

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 713-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Gwynne ◽  
L. Wills ◽  
G. Joseph ◽  
G. John ◽  
J. Staffurth ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 270 (2) ◽  
pp. 454-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivio F. Donati ◽  
Daniel Chong ◽  
Daniel Nanz ◽  
Andreas Boss ◽  
Johannes M. Froehlich ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 192 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Verbeke ◽  
M. Härle ◽  
J. Sturm

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Miyazaki ◽  
Seiji Arihiro ◽  
Eri Hayashi ◽  
Takuya Kitahara ◽  
Sayumi Oki ◽  
...  

A 76-year-old man presented to our hospital with abdominal distention and loss of appetite. The 10% of weight lost relative to this patient in 1 month. Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a giant mass, with a major axis of 23 cm, containing solid components, not involving the upper abdominal organs. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed extramural compression from the middle gastric body to the antrum, as well as a normal mucosal surface. These findings were suggestive of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor attached to the anterior wall of the stomach without metastasis or invasion. Partial gastrectomy was performed for tumor resection, and the patient was subsequently treated with adjuvant imatinib. We report a rare case of a large extramural gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach that was larger than 20 cm in diameter and present a pertinent literature review.


1984 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.B. Boekelaar ◽  
B. Baljet ◽  
J. Drukker

In this study the arterial vascular supply of the upper abdominal organs in the rat was investigated. In general the main anatomical features seem to be in accordance with the anatomy in man. However there are some important differences worth mentioning and the nomenclature used in the rat is not adequate in all respects: 1. The branch of the celiac artery which bifurcates into the hepatic artery proper and the gastroduodenal artery should not be given the incorrect name hepatic artery but is named common hepatic artery. 2. The hepato-esophageal artery is a constantly present branch of the hepatic artery proper running in the hepatogastric ligament. 3. The right gastric artery, present in about 40% of the specimens, is a branch of the gastroduodenal artery which runs towards the lesser curvature where it communicates freely with a left gastric artery branch. 4. The gastrosplenic artery is one of the branches of the splenic artery. It divides into a gastric and a splenic branch. The gastric branch is the only short gastric artery present in the rat. 5. A gastro-epiploic artery at the splenic side of the stomach is not present in the rat. The continuation of the splenic artery into the greater omentum has been referred to as the left epiploic artery. Anastomoses with epiploic branches of the gastro-epiploic artery are present in the greater omentum.


BMJ ◽  
1909 ◽  
Vol 1 (2515) ◽  
pp. 652-653
Author(s):  
A. Don

2009 ◽  
Vol 193 (5) ◽  
pp. 1318-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens-Peter Kühn ◽  
Katrin Hegenscheid ◽  
Werner Siegmund ◽  
Claus-Peter Froehlich ◽  
Norbert Hosten ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faizul Hasan Firdousi ◽  
Dhananjaya Sharma ◽  
V K Raina

Palliation of cancer related pain is one of the major concerns of patients suffering from cancer of the upper abdominal organs. The non-availability of imaging techniques to guide needle placement prompted us to use a blind technique of neurolytic coeliac plexus block. Thirty consecutive patients with intractable pain, due to documented inoperable upper abdominal visceral cancers, underwent neurolytic coeliac plexus block by blind percutaneous retrocrural unilateral neurolysis. The severity of pain was documented on a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) performed pre-block and post-block at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Pain relief was graded as excellent if the score was 0–2, good when VAS was 3–5, satisfactory when VAS was 6–7 and unsatisfactory if VAS was 8–10. Excellent pain relief was obtained in 26/30 patients (86.6%). Relief from pain diminished with time and after 3 months, 16/30 patients (53.35) graded their pain relief as excellent. Transient but severe hypotension complicated 73% of blocks. Despite the proximity of vital structures, blind unilateral retrocrural neurolytic coeliac plexus blockade is a safe and effective means to relieve the terminal pain associated with upper abdominal visceral cancer. It deserves more widespread use in patients with upper abdominal cancer. Results of the present study are encouraging and relevant for clinicians working in developing countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document