The managed-to-invasive species continuum in social and solitary bees and impacts on native bee conservation

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
Laura Russo ◽  
Charlotte W de Keyzer ◽  
Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt ◽  
Kathryn A LeCroy ◽  
James Scott MacIvor
2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
VALERIE E. PETERS ◽  
C. RONALD CARROLL ◽  
ROBERT J. COOPER ◽  
RUSSELL GREENBERG ◽  
MANUEL SOLIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1536-1541
Author(s):  
V.R. Bhatta ◽  
◽  
A.N. Kumar ◽  

Aim: The aim of the present study was to estimate the diversity and abundance of native bee fauna in an urban green space in Bengaluru, India. Methodology: Native bees were sampled from ten observational plots randomly selected from a 20 ha urban green space. Bee diversity and abundance were recorded at 15-day interval and estimated using diversity indices. Results: Nineteen species and thirteen genera under Apidae, Halictidae, and Megachilidae family were recorded. Bee species under Apidae were the most abundant, with four social, five solitary, and one kleptoparasitic species, followed by Halictidae and Megachilidae, with five and four solitary bee species, respectively. Trigona iridipennis was the dominant species followed by Apis dorsata among the social bees, and Lasioglossum sp. and Hriades sp. were dominant among the solitary bees. The number of cavity-nesting species was more that of tree-nesting or ground-nesting species. Shannon’s and Simpson’s diversity indices confirmed the species richness, species abundance, and uniform distribution of native bee species in the urban green space. Interpretation: Green patches within urban areas can support a diverse population of bees. The study area consisted of both social and solitary bees. Cavity-nesting and oligolectic generalist bees were more predominant in the urban area, thus confirming the role of urban spaces in adding to bee diversity. Green pockets within urban areas support a diverse population of bees, and urban green spaces and green corridors can help to conserve bee biodiversity and, in turn, the urban ecosystem.


2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Müller ◽  
Stefan Diener ◽  
Simone Schnyder ◽  
Katharina Stutz ◽  
Claudio Sedivy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 170156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Glaum ◽  
Maria-Carolina Simao ◽  
Chatura Vaidya ◽  
Gordon Fitch ◽  
Benjamin Iulinao

Native bee populations are critical sources of pollination. Unfortunately, native bees are declining in abundance and diversity. Much of this decline comes from human land-use change. While the effects of large-scale agriculture on native bees are relatively well understood, the effects of urban development are less clear. Understanding urbanity's effect on native bees requires consideration of specific characteristics of both particular bee species and their urban landscape. We surveyed bumble-bee ( Bombus spp.) abundance and diversity in gardens across multiple urban centres in southeastern Michigan. There are significant declines in Bombus abundance and diversity associated with urban development when measured on scales in-line with Bombus flight ability. These declines are entirely driven by declines in females; males showed no response to urbanization. We hypothesize that this is owing to differing foraging strategies between the sexes, and it suggests reduced Bombus colony density in more urban areas. While urbanity reduced Bombus prevalence, results in Detroit imply that ‘shrinking cities’ potentially offer unique urban paradigms that must be considered when studying wild bee ecology. Results show previously unidentified differences in the effects of urbanity on female and male bumble-bee populations and suggest that urban landscapes can be managed to support native bee conservation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document