Psychological mindedness and symptom reduction after psychotherapy in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Nyklíček ◽  
Daphne Majoor ◽  
Pierre A.A.M. Schalken
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Nyklíček ◽  
Johan Denollet

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 711
Author(s):  
Kara Dempster ◽  
Annie Li ◽  
Priyadharshini Sabesan ◽  
Ross Norman ◽  
Lena Palaniyappan

Although approximately 1/3 of individuals with schizophrenia are Treatment Resistant (TR), identifying these subjects prospectively remains challenging. The Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis working group defines <20% improvement as an indicator of TR, though its utility in First Episode Schizophrenia (FES) remains unknown. In a prospective cohort of FES (n = 129) followed up for 5 years, we evaluated two improvement thresholds for ‘probable TR’; <20% and <50% based on positive, negative, and total symptoms. We ascertained (1) the ecological validity (i.e., the ability to identify an expected subgroup of 1/3rd of patients); (2) the predictive validity (i.e., ability to predict poor global functioning) and (3) the clinical utility (association with clozapine use at the 5th year). Using the criteria of a total symptom reduction of <50% or negative symptom reduction of <20% resulted in ‘probable TR’ rates of 37% and 33%, respectively. Using <20% positive or total symptoms criteria resulted in very low rates, indicating minimal utility in FES. <50% total symptom criterion best predicted the global functioning over 5 years. Clozapine use was only predicted by positive symptom criterion. Prospective characterization of TRS is possible at 6 months after FES through a time-based approach using a 50% threshold for symptom change in treatment-adherent patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1169-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Zhang ◽  
Leora C. Swartzman ◽  
Robert J. Petrella ◽  
Dawn P. Gill ◽  
John Paul Minda

Author(s):  
Catherine Douglas ◽  
Lisa Wood ◽  
Danny Taggart

Abstract Background: Personal recovery from psychosis has been explored extensively in community samples but there has been little exploration with people currently receiving care from an acute mental health in-patient setting. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the personal recovery priorities of people experiencing psychosis who are currently receiving care from an acute mental health in-patient ward. Method: A Q-methodology mixed-methods approach was adopted. Thirty-eight participants were recruited from an outer London acute mental health hospital. They were required to sort 54 statements regarding personal recovery from most important to least important to reflect their recovery priorities. Thirty-six were included in the final analysis. Results: Analysis revealed four distinct viewpoints relating to factors that promote recovery in the acute mental health in-patient setting. These were: stability, independence and ‘keeping a roof over your head’; hope, optimism and enhancing well-being; personal change, self-management and social support; and symptom reduction through mental health support. Conclusions: Acute mental health in-patient wards need to ensure that they are considering the personal recovery needs of in-patients. Symptom reduction was valued by some, but broad psychosocial factors were also of priority.


2021 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Norman ◽  
Kristin A. Mannella ◽  
Huan Yang ◽  
Mike Angstadt ◽  
James L. Abelson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document