scholarly journals Stakeholders’ recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice

Author(s):  
Amy Corneli ◽  
Annemarie Forrest ◽  
Teresa Swezey ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Pamela Tenaerts
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e160
Author(s):  
Dominique Stephan ◽  
Elena-Mihaela Cordeanu ◽  
Sébastien Gaertner

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1740
Author(s):  
Eric Ursprung ◽  
Madhav Swaminathan ◽  
Frederick C. Cobey

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. e9
Author(s):  
A. Prakash ◽  
B. Medhi ◽  
S. Kaur ◽  
S. Kumari ◽  
P. Sarotra

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Murphy ◽  
Elias M. Samuels ◽  
H. Robert Kolb ◽  
Linda S. Behar-Horenstein ◽  
Ellen Champagne ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course.MethodsParticipants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys following course completion and 2 months later. Outcomes included relevance, how engaging the course was, and working differently because of the course. Open-ended questions were posed to understand how work was impacted.ResultsParticipants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8/7 points) and reported working differently (4.7/7 points). Participants with less experience in social and behavioral trials were most likely to report working differently 2 months later.DiscussionThe course was perceived as relevant and engaging. Participants described actions taken to improve rigor in implementing trials. Future studies with a larger sample and additional participating sites are recommended.


2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Appleby ◽  
Janet Sherratt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document