scholarly journals A Review of Matched-pairs Feature Selection Methods for Gene Expression Data Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 88-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Liang ◽  
Anjun Ma ◽  
Sen Yang ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Qin Ma
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Matched Pairs ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Selection Methods ◽  
Gene Expression Data Analysis

scholarly journals Inference of Genetic Networks From Time-Series and Static Gene Expression Data: Combining a Random-Forest-Based Inference Method With Feature Selection Methods

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Kimura ◽  
Ryo Fukutomi ◽  
Masato Tokuhisa ◽  
Mariko Okada
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Selection Methods ◽  
Inference Method ◽  
Combined Application ◽  
Inference Methods

Several researchers have focused on random-forest-based inference methods because of their excellent performance. Some of these inference methods also have a useful ability to analyze both time-series and static gene expression data. However, they are only of use in ranking all of the candidate regulations by assigning them confidence values. None have been capable of detecting the regulations that actually affect a gene of interest. In this study, we propose a method to remove unpromising candidate regulations by combining the random-forest-based inference method with a series of feature selection methods. In addition to detecting unpromising regulations, our proposed method uses outputs from the feature selection methods to adjust the confidence values of all of the candidate regulations that have been computed by the random-forest-based inference method. Numerical experiments showed that the combined application with the feature selection methods improved the performance of the random-forest-based inference method on 99 of the 100 trials performed on the artificial problems. However, the improvement tends to be small, since our combined method succeeded in removing only 19% of the candidate regulations at most. The combined application with the feature selection methods moreover makes the computational cost higher. While a bigger improvement at a lower computational cost would be ideal, we see no impediments to our investigation, given that our aim is to extract as much useful information as possible from a limited amount of gene expression data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document