Orb weavers: Patterns in the movement sequences of spider web construction

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (22) ◽  
pp. R1467-R1469
Author(s):  
Julie H. Simpson ◽  
Benjamin L. de Bivort
Nature ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 201 (4915) ◽  
pp. 150-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER N. WITT ◽  
CHARLES F. REED ◽  
FRANK K. TITTEL
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Corver ◽  
Nicholas Wilkerson ◽  
Jeremiah Miller ◽  
Andrew G Gordus

The geometric complexity and stereotypy of spider webs have long generated interest in their algorithmic origin. Like other examples of animal architecture, web construction is the result of several assembly phases that are driven by distinct behavioral stages coordinated to build a successful structure. Manual observations have revealed a range of sensory cues and movement patterns used during web construction, but methods to systematically quantify the dynamics of these sensorimotor patterns are lacking. Here, we apply an analytical pipeline to quantify web-making behavior of the orb-weaver Uloborus diversus. Position tracking revealed stereotyped stages of construction that could occur in typical or atypical progressions across individuals. Using an unsupervised clustering approach, we identified general and stage-specific leg movements. A Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model revealed that stages of web-building are characterized by stereotyped sequences of actions largely shared across individuals, regardless of whether these stages progress in a typical or atypical fashion. Web stages could be predicted based on action-sequences alone, revealing that web-stages are a physical manifestation of underlying behavioral phases.


Behaviour ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 331-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Eberhard

Abstract Orb web construction was originally thought to be highly stereotyped, but adaptive flexibility is now well established in several aspects. This study reviews published data on one behavioural cue and presents new data on flexibility in experimentally modified and control webs of Zosis geniculata and Uloborus diversus. By occasionally ignoring this cue temporarily, spiders gained access to otherwise inaccessible portions of their webs. I discuss three hypotheses concerning the mechanism that resulted in this flexibility. Several types of evidence argue against the hypothesis that the adjustments were pre-programmed: substantial variation in the contexts when adjustments occurred; substantial variation in details of the adjustments; and rarity of the contexts that require adjustments in nature. Lack of plausible links between behavioural decisions and payoffs from prey capture argue against a second, learning hypothesis. By elimination, this flexibility may require a third type of explanation that includes more elaborate cognitive processes.


Author(s):  
Xue-Feng Zhao ◽  
Xiao-Hong Wen ◽  
Peng Sun ◽  
Cheng Zeng ◽  
Meng-Yang Liu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Wei Hsieh ◽  
Chi-Hung Chuang ◽  
Salah Alghyaline ◽  
Hui-Fen Chiang ◽  
Chao-Hong Chiang

2021 ◽  
pp. 100137
Author(s):  
Yanan Wang ◽  
Guangyu Jiang ◽  
Zijian Yu ◽  
Qingke Wang ◽  
Xiaoman Jiang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document