scholarly journals An investigation of the most common multi-objective optimization methods with propositions for improvement

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100005
Author(s):  
Mehdi Soltanifar
Energy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 681-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfei Cui ◽  
Zhiqiang Geng ◽  
Qunxiong Zhu ◽  
Yongming Han

2020 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 103575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Henrique Dal Molin Ribeiro ◽  
Viviana Cocco Mariani ◽  
Leandro dos Santos Coelho

2015 ◽  
Vol 756 ◽  
pp. 646-651
Author(s):  
Artyom Olegovich Igumnov ◽  
Dmitry Mikhailovich Sonkin ◽  
Sergey Anatolevich Khrul

This paper considers the problem of request distribution in a taxi company for workload optimization. A combined algorithm for request distribution using multi-objective optimization methods is offered.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 1450002 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Herrero ◽  
G. Reynoso-Meza ◽  
M. Martínez ◽  
X. Blasco ◽  
J. Sanchis

Obtaining multi-objective optimization solutions with a small number of points smartly distributed along the Pareto front is a challenge. Optimization methods, such as the normalized normal constraint (NNC), propose the use of a filter to achieve a smart Pareto front distribution. The NCC optimization method presents several disadvantages related with the procedure itself, initial condition dependency, and computational burden. In this article, the epsilon-variable multi-objective genetic algorithm (ev-MOGA) is presented. This algorithm characterizes the Pareto front in a smart way and removes the disadvantages of the NNC method. Finally, examples of a three-bar truss design and controller tuning optimizations are presented for comparison purposes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document