scholarly journals An axiomatization of the median procedure on the n-cube

2011 ◽  
Vol 159 (9) ◽  
pp. 939-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Martyn Mulder ◽  
Beth Novick
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. R. McMorris ◽  
R. C. Powers

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 165-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.R. McMorris ◽  
Henry Martyn Mulder ◽  
Fred S. Roberts

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 418-423
Author(s):  
Nor Aishah Ahad ◽  
Abdul Rahman Othman ◽  
Sharipah Soaad Syed Yahaya

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Wang ◽  
Haojie Zhu ◽  
Xiaofei Li ◽  
Yan Yao ◽  
Zhimin Liu ◽  
...  

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing approach.Objective: To assess learning curve for LBBAP and compare the procedure and fluoroscopy time between LBBAP and right ventricular pacing (RVP).Methods: Consecutive bradycardia patients who underwent LBBAP or RVP were prospectively recruited from June 2018 to June 2020. The procedure and fluoroscopy time for ventricular lead placement, pacing parameters, and periprocedural complications were recorded. Restricted cubic splines were used to fit learning curves for LBBAP.Results: Left bundle branch area pacing was successful in 376 of 406 (92.6%) patients while 313 patients received RVP. Learning curve for LBBAP illustrated initial (1–50 cases), improved (51–150 cases), and stable stages (151–406 cases) with gradually increased success rates (88.0 vs. 90.0 vs. 94.5%, P = 0.106), steeply decreased median procedure (26.5 vs. 14.0 vs. 9.0min, P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (16.0 vs. 6.0 vs. 4.0min, P < 0.001), and shortened stimulus to left ventricular activation time (Sti-LVAT; 78.7 vs. 78.1 vs. 71.2 ms, P < 0.001). LBBAP at the stable stage showed longer but close median procedure (9.0 vs. 6.9min, P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (4.0 vs. 2.8min, P < 0.001) compared with RVP.Conclusion: The procedure and fluoroscopy time of LBBAP could be reduced significantly with increasing procedure volume and close to that of RVP for an experienced operator.


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. E86-E89
Author(s):  
Shinwa Tanaka ◽  
Fumiaki Kawara ◽  
Takashi Toyonaga ◽  
Robert Bechara ◽  
Namiko Hoshi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims In order to perform peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) safely, retained liquid and food debris must be removed before the procedure is started. We developed a novel technique using a super-slim gastroscope, and a gastric tube to remove retained food debris in achalasia patients. In this study, the safety and efficacy of this novel technique were investigated Patients and methods Eleven patients with achalasia were enrolled in this study and underwent this novel method for esophageal clearance. Results All patients had complete clearance of the retained food debris using this method. The median procedure time (range) was 13 (6 – 30) minutes. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) and one minor AE of mucosal erythema due to mucosal suctioning. Conclusion This novel method for esophageal clearance is safe and effective in achalasia patients with large amounts of retained food debris.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document