Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Need for Improvement in Diagnostic Criteria

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a hypomotility disorder with decreased contraction vigor and normally relaxing lower esophageal sphincter. Although IEM has been associated with poor esophageal clearance and gastroesophageal reflux, it is also seen in asymptomatic subjects and is often of unclear clinical significance. The Chicago classification version 4.0 updated the diagnostic threshold to require >70% weak or fragmented swallows or ≥50% failed swallows for a conclusive diagnosis of IEM. Provocation testing are recommended in borderline cases to assess clinical relevance. Prospective trials are needed to further refine the diagnostic criteria, understand the pathophysiology, and develop an effective treatment for IEM.

Risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia

Summary Peptic esophagitis can occur as a complication of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) among patients with esophageal achalasia. The goal of this study was to identify the characteristics of patients who have developed peptic esophagitis following LHD surgery along with the risk factors associated with the occurrence of peptic esophagitis. Among the 447 cases consisting of esophageal achalasia patients who underwent LHD as the primary surgery, we compared the patient background, pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical outcomes according to whether or not peptic esophagitis occurred following surgery. We also attempted to use univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors for peptic esophagitis occurring following surgery. Esophagitis following surgery was confirmed in 67 cases (15.0%). With respect to the patient backgrounds for cases in which peptic esophagitis had occurred, a significantly higher number were male patients, with a significantly high occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery in terms of surgical outcomes, along with a high occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias in terms of postoperative course (P = 0.045, 0.041, and 0.022, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in terms of age, BMI, disease duration, preoperative symptoms, esophageal manometric findings, esophageal barium findings, and esophageal clearance. A multivariate analysis indicated independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD as being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias. Peptic esophagitis occurred following LHD in 15% of cases. Independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD included being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias following surgery.

Сapabilitу of 24-hour esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in the diagnosis of GERD-associated laryngeal diseases

Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), despite the improvement of methods of diagnosis and treatment of patients with this pathology, still remain an urgent problem of medicine and cause increased attention of clinicians and researchers. In some cases, patients with GERD do not present typical complaints of heartburn, regurgitation; the disease may manifest extraesophageal manifestations, such as chronic cough, hoarseness, reflux laryngitis, and others caused by the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LFR) – inflammation of the mucous membrane of the upper digestive and respiratory tracts with possible morphological changes associated with direct and indirect (reflex) exposure to gastroduodenal reflux. The occurrence of LFR is possible due to a violation of the motor function of the esophagus and insufficiency of the upper esophageal sphincter, as well as a decrease in the tone of the pharyngeal muscles. The most accessible methods of diagnosis of LFR are registration of complaints according to the questionnaire “index of reflux symptoms”, assessment of the clinical and functional state of the larynx using a visually analog “scale of reflux signs”. A positive response to the empirical use of proton pump inhibitors in combination with procinetics and determination of pepsin content in saliva can also be alternative diagnostic methods. To date, 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring is a method that allows the most accurate diagnosis of all types of reflux, regardless of the pH value, to verify high reflux in combination with its physical properties, as well as to estimate the time of chemical and volumetric esophageal clearance. In addition to performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy, the use of this method is indicated in patients with suspected extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. The article presents clinical examples of patients with extraesophageal manifestations of GERD, describes the possibilities of 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring of the esophagus in the diagnosis of LFR and reflux-associated diseases of the larynx.

373 ESOPHAGEAL BODY PERISTALSIS IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER: ARE VIDEO ESOPHAGOGRAM AND HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY IN AGREEMENT?

Peristaltic disorders of the esophageal body have been categorized according to how they appear on high-resolution manometry. Abnormalities in peristalsis may lead to abnormal esophageal clearance and dysphagia. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to study bolus transit patterns on barium esophagogram in patients with various grades of esophageal body peristalsis as diagnosed by high-resolution manometry. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, we queried an esophageal center database to identify patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter parameters. Patients with jackhammer esophagus, esophageal spasm, previous foregut surgery, hiatal hernia, and fragmented peristalsis were excluded. Remaining patients were divided into 11 groups based on their percentages of normal swallows out of 10 swallows (0%–100% swallows normal, DCI > 450 mmHg.s.cm). All previously obtained video esophagograms were re-evaluated in blinded fashion. Bolus transit time through the esophagus was measured in upright and prone positions, using live time stamps at the entry and exit of the bolus. ANOVA and χ2 were used. Results In total, 146 patients were included in the analysis. 73 (50%) were men. Mean age and body mass index were 58.4 ± 14.7 years and 22.8 ± 10.4 kg/m2, respectively. Bolus transit time in prone-position swallows increased in tandem with increases in number of abnormal swallows (11.3 ± 3.7, 22 ± 15.5, 29.5 ± 24.3, 42.7 ± 39.5, 42.4 ± 46.9, 64 ± 70.8, 59.4 ± 34.6, 58.8 ± 37.9, 110 ± 66.6, 83.2 ± 49.6 and 105.6 ± 72.5 seconds, p < 0.0001) but no difference was noted in upright-position bolus transit time (p = 0.317). There was a dropoff in level of significance at Group 5 (60% swallows normal) compared to Group 11 (absent contractility), after which there were no inter-group differences (Fig. 1). Conclusion Bolus transit time in prone-position swallows progressively increases as percentage of normal swallows decreases. Further work associated with symptoms to define a cutoff between normal and ineffective peristalsis would be useful.