Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique using an intrahepatic bile duct approach with a “push endoscopic position”

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Minaga ◽  
Keijiro Okada ◽  
Yoshito Uenoyama ◽  
Yukitaka Yamashita
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3879
Author(s):  
Saburo Matsubara ◽  
Keito Nakagawa ◽  
Kentaro Suda ◽  
Takeshi Otsuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Isayama ◽  
...  

Background: The selection of an approach route in endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous (EUS-RV) for failed biliary cannulation is complicated. We proposed an algorithm for EUS-RV. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive EUS-RV cases between April 2017 and July 2020. Puncturing the distal extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) from the duodenal second part (D2) (DEHBD/D2 route) was attempted first. If necessary, puncturing the proximal EHBD from the duodenal bulb (D1) (PEHBD/D1 route), puncturing the left intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD) from the stomach (LIHBD/S route), or puncturing the right IHBD from the D1 (RIHBD/D1 route) were attempted in this order. Results: A total of 16 patients were included. The DEHBD/D2 route was used in 10 (62.5%) patients. The PEHBD/D1 route was attempted in five (31.3%) patients, and the biliary puncture failed in one patient in whom the RIHBD/D1 route was used because of tumor invasion to the left hepatic lobe. The LIHBD/S route was applied in one (6.3%) patient. Successful biliary cannulation was achieved in all patients eventually. The time from the puncture to the guidewire placement in the DEHBD/D2 route (3.5 min) was shorter than that in other methods (14.0 min) (p = 0.014). Adverse events occurred in one (6.3%) patient with moderate pancreatitis. Conclusions: The proposed algorithm might be useful for the selection of an appropriate approach route in EUS-RV.


Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (08) ◽  
pp. E195-E196
Author(s):  
Takeshi Ogura ◽  
Atsushi Okuda ◽  
Akira Miyano ◽  
Rieko Kamiyama ◽  
Nobu Nishioka ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Ogura ◽  
Nobu Nishioka ◽  
Saori Ueno ◽  
Tadahiro Yamada ◽  
Masanori Yamada ◽  
...  

Background With endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), guidewire manipulation might be a critically limiting step for nonexperts. However, the causes of difficult guidewire manipulation remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with successful guidewire manipulation. Methods This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between October 2018 and October 2019. We measured scope angle between the long and needle axes of the echoendoscope using still fluoroscopic imaging immediately after puncturing the intrahepatic bile duct. Factors associated with successful guidewire insertion were assessed by multivariable analysis using logistic regression. Result The influence of the angle between the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle and echoendoscope on failed guidewire insertion was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.00 – 0.76), and an angle of 135° offered 88.0 % sensitivity and 82.9 % specificity for predicting successful guidewire insertion. According to multivariable analysis, only angle between the FNA needle and echoendoscope > 135° was independently associated with successful guidewire insertion (odd ratio 0.03, 95 %CI 0.01 – 0.14; P < 0.05), whereas sex, puncture site, and diameter of puncture site were not significant factors. After multivariable analysis, all variables were adjusted using age ≥ 70 or < 70 years, yielding the same results. Conclusion The angle between the FNA needle and echoendoscope might be associated with successful guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS. Adjusting this angle to 135° before puncturing the intrahepatic bile duct might be helpful in achieving successful guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS. 


Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (06) ◽  
pp. E135-E136
Author(s):  
Adrien Sportes ◽  
Sarah Leblanc ◽  
Benoit Bordacahar ◽  
Maximilien Barret ◽  
Frederic Prat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document