Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use

2005 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Bernstein ◽  
Edward Bernstein ◽  
Katherine Tassiopoulos ◽  
Timothy Heeren ◽  
Suzette Levenson ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 732-742
Author(s):  
Justin Walthers ◽  
Tim Janssen ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Ariel Hoadley ◽  
Nancy P. Barnett ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Gaume ◽  
Richard Longabaugh ◽  
Molly Magill ◽  
Nicolas Bertholet ◽  
Gerhard Gmel ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246652
Author(s):  
Jacques Gaume ◽  
Véronique S. Grazioli ◽  
Sophie Paroz ◽  
Cristiana Fortini ◽  
Nicolas Bertholet ◽  
...  

Background Unhealthy alcohol use among young adults is a major public health concern. Brief motivational interventions for young adults in the Emergency Department (ED) have shown promising but inconsistent results. Methods Based on the literature on brief intervention and motivational interviewing efficacy and active ingredients, we developed a new motivational intervention model for young adults admitted in the ED with alcohol intoxication. Using an iterative qualitative design, we first pre-tested this model by conducting 4 experimental sessions and 8 related semi-structured interviews to evaluate clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions of the intervention’s acceptability and feasibility. We then conducted a consultation meeting with 9 international experts using a nominal group technique. The intervention model was adjusted and finally re-tested by conducting 6 new experimental sessions and 12 related semi-structured interviews. At each round, data collected were analyzed and discussed, and the intervention model updated accordingly. Results Based on the literature, we found 6 axes for developing a new model: High level of relational factors (e.g. empathy, alliance, avoidance of confrontation); Personalized feedback; Enhance discrepancy; Evoke change talk while softening sustain talk, strengthen ability and commitment to change; Completion of a change plan; Devote more time: longer sessions and follow-up options (face-to-face, telephone, or electronic boosters; referral to treatment). A qualitative analysis of the semi-structured interviews gave important insights regarding acceptability and feasibility of the model. Adjustments were made around which information to provide and how, as well as on how to deepen discussion about change with patients having low levels of self-exploration. The experts’ consultation addressed numerous points, such as information and advice giving, and booster interventions. Discussion This iterative, multi-component design resulted in the development of an intervention model embedded in recent research findings and theory advances, as well as feasible in a complex environment. The next step is a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of this model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Field ◽  
Sandra Oviedo Ramirez ◽  
Patricia Juarez ◽  
Yessenia Castro

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 2361-2372
Author(s):  
Craig A. Field ◽  
Dylan K. Richards ◽  
Yessenia Castro ◽  
José Alonso Cabriales ◽  
Amy Wagler ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Gaume ◽  
Nicolas Bertholet ◽  
Mohamed Faouzi ◽  
Gerhard Gmel ◽  
Jean-Bernard Daeppen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document