scholarly journals Our Preferred Technique for Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Allograft Preparation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e2591-e2596
Author(s):  
Steven DeFroda ◽  
Michael Fice ◽  
Sarah Tepper ◽  
Bernard R. Bach
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon

scholarly journals The effects of multiple freeze–thaw cycles on the biomechanical properties of the human bone‐patellar tendon‐bone allograft

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1193-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho‐Joong Jung ◽  
Gautum Vangipuram ◽  
Matthew B. Fisher ◽  
Guoguang Yang ◽  
Shanling Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
Human Bone ◽  
Freeze Thaw ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon

Clinical Comparison of the Tutoplast Allograft and Autologous Patellar Tendon (Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone) for the Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1202-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottmar Gorschewsky ◽  
Andreas Klakow ◽  
Kathrin Riechert ◽  
Martin Pitzl ◽  
Roland Becker
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bone Autograft ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon

Background The use of an allograft as a suitable transplant is still open to debate, in terms of donor morbidity, implantation reaction, and long-term results, as well as the risk of disease transmission. Hypothesis The clinical results 2 and 6 years after implantation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft (Tutoplast) and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft show no significant difference in relation to stability, function, and rate of rupture. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Method Between 1995 and 1998, 268 patients with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures were surgically treated: 132 patients received a bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft implantation and 136 patients a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. The results were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee, Noyes, and Lysholm scores. Results There were 201 patients assessable after 2 years and 186 patients after 6 years. Ruptures of the implants in the allo-graft group occurred in 20 patients (20.6%) within 2 years and in 38 patients (44.7%) after 6 years. In the autograft group, transplants ruptured in 5 patients (4.8%) after 2 years and in 6 patients (5.9%) after 6 years. Conclusion Based on the data, it would appear that the regular use of bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts, particularly for physically active patients, is unsuitable.

scholarly journals Late reconstruction of the patellar tendon in rheumatoid arthritis using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 66-69
Author(s):  
Jesús Palencia ◽  
Saud M. Alfayez ◽  
Ahmad A. Alshammri ◽  
Hani S. Serhan ◽  
Firas Serro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Bone Allograft ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document