Flow Characteristics of the SAPIEN Aortic Valve: The Importance of Recognizing In-Stent Flow Acceleration for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Function

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 603-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Shames ◽  
Agnes Koczo ◽  
Rebecca Hahn ◽  
Zhezhen Jin ◽  
Michael H. Picard ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1161-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagit Ben Zekry ◽  
Robert M. Saad ◽  
Mehmet Özkan ◽  
Maie S. Al Shahid ◽  
Mauro Pepi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Duncan

Background: Echocardiographic evaluation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) includes estimation of effective<br />orifice area (EOA). EOA calculation depends on sub-valvular stroke volume (SV), which depends on sub-valvular diameter and<br />velocity time integral (VTI). The Medtronic CoreValve area changes throughout its length. We aimed to (i) compare SV at two<br />sites of flow acceleration: ‘pre-stent’ and ‘in-stent, pre-valve’, (ii) assess effects of possible differences in sub-valvular SV on<br />EOA, and (iii) assess agreement of measurement of EOA calculation after CoreValve TAVI.<br />Methods: We studied 43 patients after CoreValve implantation. All had transthoracic echocardiography 5-7 days after TAVI.<br />Sub-valvular SV was measured ‘pre-stent’ and ‘in-stent, pre-valve’. Measurement agreement was assessed by root mean<br />square (RMS) differences and Bland-Altman analyses.<br />Results: SV was consistently higher ‘in-stent, pre-valve’ compared with ‘pre-stent’ (62±20ml vs. 53±19ml, p&lt;0.001), so that<br />EOA was correspondingly larger using ‘in-stent, pre-valve’ measurements (1.7±0.5cm2 vs. 1.4±0.5cm2, p&lt;0.001). Betweenobserver<br />RMS difference for calculation of EOA was higher ‘in-stent, pre-valve’ compared to ‘pre-stent’ (0.53 cm2 vs.<br />0.23cm2, difference from zero 0.17, p=0.002). Though sub-valvular diameter measurements were variable, VTI variability was<br />additionally higher ‘in-stent, pre-valve’ compared to ‘pre-stent’ (0.42cm vs. 0.6cm, difference from zero -1.74, p=0.11).<br />Conclusion: Calculation of EOA after CoreValve TAVI is highly dependent on sub-valvular sample position. EOA may be<br />underestimated using ‘pre-stent’ SV, and overestimated using ‘in-stent, pre-valve’ SV. Limitations in SV reproducibility<br />suggests EOA should be used in conjunction with other indices of valve function in serial assessment of CoreValve function<br />following TAVI.


CHEST Journal ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiji Iwasaka ◽  
Charles Z. Naggar ◽  
Tetsuro Sugiura ◽  
Noritaka Tarumi ◽  
Yasuo Takayama ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Barannyk ◽  
Peter Oshkai

In this paper, performance of aortic heart valve prosthesis in different geometries of the aortic root is investigated experimentally. The objective of this investigation is to establish a set of parameters, which are associated with abnormal flow patterns due to the flow through a prosthetic heart valve implanted in the patients that had certain types of valve diseases prior to the valve replacement. Specific valve diseases were classified into two clinical categories and were correlated with the corresponding changes in aortic root geometry while keeping the aortic base diameter fixed. These categories correspond to aortic valve stenosis and aortic valve insufficiency. The control case that corresponds to the aortic root of a patient without valve disease was used as a reference. Experiments were performed at test conditions corresponding to 70 beats/min, 5.5 L/min target cardiac output, and a mean aortic pressure of 100 mmHg. By varying the aortic root geometry, while keeping the diameter of the orifice constant, it was possible to investigate corresponding changes in the levels of Reynolds shear stress and establish the possibility of platelet activation and, as a result of that, the formation of blood clots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document