scholarly journals Corrigendum to “Ecosystem services of the big bend region of the chihuahuan desert” [Ecosyst. Services 27 (2017) 48–57]

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Nathan T. Taylor ◽  
Kendall M. Davis ◽  
Helena Abad ◽  
Maureen R. McClung ◽  
Matthew D. Moran
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan T. Taylor ◽  
Kendall M. Davis ◽  
Helena Abad ◽  
Maureen R. McClung ◽  
Matthew D. Moran

1990 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Elias ◽  
Thomas R. Van Devender

AbstractA series of 50 packrat midden assemblages from the Big Bend region of the Chihuahuan Desert, ranging in age from >36,000 yr B.P. to recent, yielded abundant, diverse arthropod faunas. The mesic nature of regional Wisconsin age climates is substantiated by the fauna from 30,000–12,000 yr B.P., especially during the middle Wisconsin (30,000–20,000 yr B.P.). Late Wisconsin faunas contained grassland species which are confined today to cooler, moister regions. Following 12,000 yr B.P., most of these temperate species were replaced either by desert species or by more cosmopolitan taxa, marking the climatic shift from late Wisconsin to postglacial time. Insects indicative of more severe aridity are first recorded at about 6000 yr B.P., but some temperate species persisted until about 2500 yr B.P. After this, only desert dwellers are recorded.


Hydrobiologia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 546 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Wallace ◽  
Elizabeth J. Walsh ◽  
M.L. Arroyo ◽  
Peter L. Starkweather

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-576
Author(s):  
Frederick B. Stangl Jr ◽  
Dana R. Mills ◽  
Michael W. Haiduk
Keyword(s):  
Big Bend ◽  

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1297-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
GEORGES L WEATHERLY ◽  
DAVID THISTLE
Keyword(s):  
Big Bend ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (12) ◽  
pp. 1471-1480
Author(s):  
Seiji Miyazono ◽  
Allison A. Pease ◽  
Sarah Fritts ◽  
Timothy B. Grabowski

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 101-102
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Cummings ◽  
Michal Kowalewski ◽  
Savanna Barry ◽  
Thomas K. Frazer

1944 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Tinkham

This is one of a series of papers on the insect life of the Big Bend Region of Trans-Pecos, Texas, in which the author plans to present a fairly complete picture of the insect and animal life of that little known region. The area is composed of Presidio and Jeff Davis Counties, the former mainly Lower Sonoran in its faunal affinities, the latter principally Upper Sonoran and partly Transitional. Each county has its own mountain system; Presidio County the Chinati Mountains and Jeff Davis County the Davis Range. The Chinatis are desert mountains; the Davis are forested with oaks and pines.


1936 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. F. Wood

Trait manifestations for the Hopewellian, or according to the more recently accepted terminology, the Central Basin cultural phase, have for several years been known to exist in eastern Wisconsin, but the occurrence of this phase with a residentiary cultural group in the eastern part of the state has had no positive indication until recently when a typical Central Basin mound burial was discovered in the Big Bend region of Waukesha County.The burial was partially unearthed by Mr. Henry J. Peterson while grading a portion of his land fronting on the south bank of Fox River in the N.W. ¼ of the N.W. ¼ of Section 25, Vernon Township. Mr. Peterson immediately notified the Milwaukee Public Museum of his find and kindly invited members of the staff to investigate the site. Mr. Peterson should here be commended for his foresight which made possible the gathering and preservation of data which otherwise might have been lost forever.


2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dee Ann Cooper ◽  
Roger W. Cooper ◽  
James B. Stevens ◽  
M.S. Stevens ◽  
William A. Cobban ◽  
...  

Abstract The upper lower Cenomanian through middle Santonian (Upper Cretaceous) of the Boquillas Formation in the Big Bend Region of Trans-Pecos Texas consists of a marine carbonate succession deposited at the southern end of the Western Interior Seaway. The Boquillas Formation, subdivided into the lower, c. 78 m thick limestone-shale Ernst Member, and the upper, c. 132 m thick limestone/chalk/marl San Vicente Member, was deposited in a shallow shelf open marine environment at the junction between the Western Interior Seaway and the western margins of the Tethys Basin. Biogeographically, the area was closely tied with the southern Western Interior Seaway. The richly fossiliferous upper Turonian, Coniacian and lower Santonian parts of the Boquillas Formation are particularly promising for multistratigraphic studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document