Abstract
Background
Promoting health rather than treating disease is gaining popularity and promotion initiatives are increasingly situated in the societal domain. In this scoping review, the literature on quantitative health impact assessment (HIA) practice and methodology is explored in order to provide an overview of methods that have been used or proposed for estimating societal initiatives’ health outcomes.
Methods
Systematic searches were done in PubMed and Web of Science in order to identify relevant literature. A set of selection criteria ensured that studies held useful quantitative HIA methodology and a societal approach. Reference lists of all selected studies were then examined for other studies. After literature selection, quantifiable features of interest were recorded and general observations on the composition of the current literature were made.
Results
The literature selection process yielded 54 included studies, most of which focus on lifestyle-related determinants. Of different health outcome measurements, deaths (averted) was most frequently used, followed by life years and quality- and disability-adjusted life years. Equity is frequently mentioned, but not often estimated. Most studies made estimates based on simulation models, notably with Monte Carlo, Markov and system dynamics models (simulation period mean 46 years; median 50 years). Inputs for the models such as relative risks, transition probabilities and price elasticities were taken from census and register data, survey data, evidence from previous (scientific) studies and outcomes from stakeholder sessions.
Conclusions
HIA holds a wide range of practices with some overlap. Different methods’ strengths and weaknesses partly depend on the phenomenon of interest. Some policy types have standard approaches, but there is no one universal optimal method and therefore having a grasp of multiple methods is useful. Furthermore, estimating health effect distributions could make an important addition to HIA.
Key messages
Quantitative HIA can be conducted using various methodological bases and most studies use some form of simulation modelling. Different simulation methods are distinct, but do show some overlap. Quantitative HIA topics often relate to individual behaviour (micro-level proximal determinants). There is room for HIA method development for determinants with indirect connections to the individual.
Health impact assessment and health equity in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review
