An open-label, multicentre safety study of vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma: final analysis and a validated prognostic scoring system

2019 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 175-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Larkin ◽  
Michael P. Brown ◽  
Ana M. Arance ◽  
Axel Hauschild ◽  
Paola Queirolo ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Larkin ◽  
Michele Del Vecchio ◽  
Paolo A Ascierto ◽  
Ivana Krajsova ◽  
Jacob Schachter ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix366
Author(s):  
C. Blank ◽  
M. Del Vecchio ◽  
P.A. Ascierto ◽  
P. Queirolo ◽  
A. Hauschild ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8517-8517 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. G. Larkin ◽  
Paola Queirolo ◽  
Ana M Arance ◽  
Michael Paul Brown ◽  
Axel Hauschild ◽  
...  

8517 Background: Vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, is associated with improved PFS and OS in patients (pts) with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma (mM). We present preliminary safety and efficacy findings from a safety study of vemurafenib in pts with unresectable stage IIIC/IV mM with BRAFV600 mutations. Methods: Pts with untreated or previously treated stage IIIC/IV BRAFV600 mutation-positive (cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test) melanoma were enrolled. Pts received continuous oral vemurafenib 960 mg bid. Primary study endpoint was safety; efficacy (RECIST V 1.1) was a secondary endpoint. Results: Of 1,964 screened pts between Mar and Sep 2011, 914 (47%) were enrolled and 834 were evaluable for safety. Median age was 53 (21–88 years), 55% males. Median time since first mM diagnosis was 7.6 months (0–18 years). At baseline, 80% of pts had ECOG PS 0–1, 11% ECOG PS 2 (missing 9%); 27% of pts had brain metastases, and 31% had elevated LDH. Most pts had received prior systemic therapy (70%) including ipilimumab (14%), MEK and BRAF inhibitors (2%). At data cut-off (Sep 30, 2011), median treatment duration was 68 days (1–223 days) with 87% of pts still on treatment. Of 834 pts, 553 (66%) to date have reported AEs. Of 553 pts reporting AEs, 88% were related to vemurafenib, 33% Grade 3, and 1.9% Grade 4. The most common (>1%) Grade 3/4 AEs were rash (3.6%), arthralgia (3.1%), and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma/keratoacanthoma (4.3%). Most common AEs (>10%) of any grade were arthralgia (31%), rash (29%), fatigue (22%), photosensitivity (21%), nausea (15%), and were similar irrespective of brain metastases and ECOG PS. AEs caused treatment interruption in 141 (17%) pts. Of 109 pts who discontinued treatment (13%), main reasons for withdrawal were progressive disease (60%), death (20%), AEs (6%; most commonly arthritis and abdominal pain). Tumor assessments at Week 8 of treatment were available for 302/834 (36%) pts, 61% pts achieved CR or PR, and 29% had SD. Conclusions: In a setting representative of routine clinical practice, vemurafenib is seen to be well tolerated and both safety profile and activity resemble the phase I–III data although this analysis is limited by the study duration.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9046-9046 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. G. Larkin ◽  
Michele Del Vecchio ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
Jacob Schachter ◽  
Claus Garbe ◽  
...  

9046 Background: Vemurafenib (VEM), a BRAF kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated high response rates and improved progression-free and overall survival in pts with BRAFV600mutation–positive metastatic melanoma (mM). We present interim results from predefined subgroups from a large multicenter, open-label safety study of VEM in pts with mM (NCT01307397). Methods: Pts with BRAFV600mutation–positive histologically confirmed mM received VEM (960 mg BID) as first-line therapy or subsequent to previous therapies. Assessments for safety and efficacy were made every 28 days. Results: As of Feb 29, 2012, 2,265 pts have received VEM. Pts had a median age of 54.0 (13-95) yrs and median time since diagnosis of mM of 6.2 (0-351.9) mos. 59% had received prior systemic therapy. Median time of exposure to VEM as of the cut-off date was 3 (0.03-11.24) mos for the overall population and majority of subgroups, and approximately 2.5 mos for pts with ECOG ≥2 and age ≥75 yrs. 1537 (68%) pts were still receiving VEM at the cut-off date. 728 (32%) pts discontinued, most frequently because of PD (538/728 pts; 74%). Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 87% of all patients, with arthralgia (32%) and rash (26%) the most frequent. The incidences of AEs in the subgroups are summarized (Table). Although efficacy analyses are limited by the short duration of follow-up, six-month OS rate was 76% (95% CI 72-79%) and median PFS was 4.1 mos (95% CI 3.9-4.5 mos). Postbaseline tumor assessments were available for 63% and 30% of pts at wk 8 and 16, respectively. At wk 8 CR: 2%, PR: 57%, SD: 30%, PD: 6%. At wk 16 CR: 3%, PR: 46%, SD: 31%, PD: 15%. Conclusions: Although the overall safety profile of VEM in this study was consistent with previous clinical data, interim analyses of subgroups suggest that very elderly pts may be at higher risk of G3 AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01307397. [Table: see text]


2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 795-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Berenson ◽  
Elza Vasconcellos ◽  
Ann Pakalnis ◽  
Lian Mao ◽  
David M. Biondi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document