Brain Metastases
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9931
(FIVE YEARS 5243)

H-INDEX

142
(FIVE YEARS 57)

2021 ◽  
pp. clincanres.0361.2021
Author(s):  
R. Alejandro Marquez-Ortiz ◽  
Maria J. Contreras-Zarate ◽  
Vesna Tesic ◽  
Karen LF Alvarez-Eraso ◽  
Gina Kwak ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Sachdev ◽  
Timothy L. Sita ◽  
Mahesh Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Michael K. Rooney ◽  
Alexander Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose:Gamma Knife (GK) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used as an initial treatment for patients with ten or more brain metastases (BM). However, the clinical and dosimetric consequences of this practice are not well established.Methods: We performed a single institution, retrospective analysis of 30 patients who received GK SRS for ten or more BM in one session. We utilized MIM Software to contour the whole brain and accumulated the doses from all treated lesions to determine the mean dose delivered to the whole brain. Patient outcomes were determined from chart review. Results: Our cohort had a median number of 13 treated lesions (range 10 to 26 lesions) for a total of 427 treated lesions. The mean dose to the whole brain was determined to be 1.8 ± 0.91 Gy (range 0.70 to 3.8 Gy). Mean dose to the whole brain did not correlate with the number of treated lesions (Pearson r=0.23, p=0.21), but was closely associated with tumor volume (Pearson r=0.95, p<0.0001). There were no significant correlations between overall survival and number of lesions or aggregate tumor volume. Fourteen patients (47%) underwent additional SRS sessions and six patients (20%) underwent WBRT a median of 6.6 months (range 3.0-50 months) after SRS. Two patients (6.6%) developed grade 2 radionecrosis following SRS beyond earlier WBRT.Conclusion: The mean dose to the whole brain in patients treated with GK SRS for 10 or more BM remained low with an acceptable rate of radionecrosis. This strategy allowed the majority of patients to avoid subsequent WBRT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Wu ◽  
Zan Jiao ◽  
Yixuan Li ◽  
Jin Peng ◽  
Fan Yao ◽  
...  

BackgroundBrain metastasis from differentiated thyroid cancer has followed a similar increasing trend to that of thyroid cancer in recent years. However, the characteristics and treatments for brain metastases are unclear. The aim of this study was to understand this disease by analyzing patients with brain metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).MethodsBetween 2000 and 2020, the database of the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center was searched for differentiated thyroid cancer patients. We identified a cohort of 22 patients with brain metastases. The characteristics of the patients, histological features, treatments, and time of death were reviewed. The overall survival (OS) rate was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Survival curves of different subgroups were compared according to baseline characteristics and treatments received.ResultsA total of 22 (1.09%) out of 2013 DTC patients in the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center database were identified as having brain metastases. The overall median survival time was 17.5 months (range from 1–60 months) after diagnosis of brain metastasis. Performance statue (PS), tumor site, and neurosurgery impacted survival, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. Prognosis of skull metastasis was superior to that of intracranial types. Neurosurgery was the only type of treatment that had an impact on patient OS.ConclusionsBrain metastasis from differentiated thyroid cancer has a poor prognosis. However, it can be improved by comprehensive treatment. PS of the patients can greatly affect survival. Skull metastases have improved prognosis over intracranial types. Radioiodine therapy (RAIT) appears to effectively improve the prognosis of patients with skull metastases from DTC.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Alexander ◽  
Jill S. Remick ◽  
Emily S. Kowalski ◽  
Kai Sun ◽  
Yannick Poirer ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundSingle-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) for the treatment of brain metastases can be delivered with either a Gamma-Knife platform (GK-SRS) or with a frameless linear accelerator (LA-SRS) which vary based on patterns of prescribing, patient setup and radiation delivery. Whether these differences affect clinical outcomes is unknown. MethodsPatients treated for metastatic brain cancer treated with SF-SRS from 2014-2020 were retrospectively reviewed and clinical outcomes were recorded on a per lesion basis. Covariates between groups were compared using a Chi-square analysis for dichotomous variables and t-test for continuous variables. Median follow up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan Meier (KM) method. Primary endpoints of local failure (LF) and symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) were estimated using the KM method with salvage WBRT used as a censoring event. Outcome estimates were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis (MVA) and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used for statistical analyses. Propensity score (PS) adjustments were used to reduce the effects confounding variables.ResultsOverall, 119 patients with 287 lesions were included for analysis which included 57 patients (127 lesions) treated with LA-SRS compared to 62 patients (160 lesions) treated with GK-SRS. On both multivariate and univariate analysis, there was no statistically significant differences between GK-SRS and LA-SRS for LF, RN, or the combined endpoint of either LF or RN (multivariate p-value=0.17).ConclusionsIn our retrospective cohort, we found no statistically significant differences in the incidence of RN or LF in patients treated with GK-SRS when compared to LA-SRS.Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Guo ◽  
Jiafeng Liu ◽  
Yanping Li ◽  
Qingqing Chen ◽  
Yunzheng Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of combination of the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) parameters and systemic immune-inflammation (SII) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods: 118 NSCLC patients with BM who treated with stereotactic radiotherapy were retrospectively enrolled into this study. All patients underwent MRS and blood samples test for SII analysis before the initiation of stereotactic radiotherapy. The correlation between the parameters of MRS and SII level were assessed using the spearman correlation coefficient. The cut-off values for the parameters of MRS, SII and clinical laboratory variables were defined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to quantify these predictive value. The prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.Results: The median follow-up time was 25 months (range, 12-49months). The optimal cutoff point for the cho/cr and SII were 1.50 and 480, respectively. The cho/cr was negatively correlated with SII (rs = 0.164, P = 0.075), but there was a trend. C-SII score was established by combining cho/cr and SII. Patients with both an elevated cho/cr (> 1.50) and an elevated SII (> 480) were given a C-SII score of 2, and patients with one or neither were given a C-SII score of 1 or 0, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the C-SII score of 2 was significantly linked with poor OS and PFS (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). In the Cox proportional hazards model, the C-SII score independently predicted OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.749; 95% CI, 1.176-2.601; P = 0.006] and PFS (HR, 2.472; 95% CI, 1.624-3.763; P < 0.001). Conclusion: C-SII score was more accurate for predicting the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients with BM who undergo stereotactic radiotherapy. The C-SII score, which was superior to either score alone, which could be used to identify for BM from NSCLC patients with poor outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie S. Joe ◽  
Christine Hodgdon ◽  
Lianne Kraemer ◽  
Kristin J. Redmond ◽  
Vered Stearns ◽  
...  

AbstractBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Approximately one-tenth of all patients with advanced breast cancer develop brain metastases resulting in an overall survival rate of fewer than 2 years. The challenges lie in developing new approaches to treat, monitor, and prevent breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). This review will provide an overview of BCBM from the integrated perspective of clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. We will summarize the current management of BCBM, including diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. We will highlight ongoing translational research for BCBM, including clinical trials and improved detection methods that can become the mainstay for BCBM treatment if they demonstrate efficacy. We will discuss preclinical BCBM research that focuses on the intrinsic properties of breast cancer cells and the influence of the brain microenvironment. Finally, we will spotlight emerging studies and future research needs to improve survival outcomes and preserve the quality of life for patients with BCBM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motaz Hamed ◽  
Niklas Schäfer ◽  
Christian Bode ◽  
Valeri Borger ◽  
Anna-Laura Potthoff ◽  
...  

ObjectIntra-tumoral hemorrhage is considered an imaging characteristic of advanced cancer disease. However, data on the influence of intra-tumoral hemorrhage in patients with brain metastases (BM) remains scarce. We aimed at investigating patients with BM who underwent neurosurgical resection of the metastatic lesion for a potential impact of preoperative hemorrhagic transformation on overall survival (OS).MethodsBetween 2013 and 2018, 357 patients with BM were surgically treated at the authors’ neuro-oncological center. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were assessed for the occurrence of malignant hemorrhagic transformation.Results122 of 375 patients (34%) with BM revealed preoperative intra-tumoral hemorrhage. Patients with hemorrhagic transformed BM exhibited a median OS of 5 months compared to 12 months for patients without intra-tumoral hemorrhage. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hemorrhagic transformation as an independent and significant predictor for worsened OS.ConclusionsThe present study identifies preoperative intra-tumoral hemorrhage as an indicator variable for poor prognosis in patients with BM undergoing neurosurgical treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Lauko ◽  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Addison Barnett ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Vineeth Tatineni ◽  
...  

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have resulted in improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, data demonstrating the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC brain metastases (NSCLCBM) is limited. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLCBM treated with ICIs within 90 days of NSCLCBM diagnosis (ICI-90) and compared them to patients who never received ICIs (no-ICI). We reviewed 800 patients with LCBM who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 at a major tertiary care institution, 97% of whom received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for local treatment of BM. OS from BM was compared between the ICI-90 and no-ICI groups using the Log-Rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model. Additionally, the impact of KRAS mutational status on the efficacy of ICI was investigated. After accounting for known prognostic factors, ICI-90 in addition to SRS led to significantly improved OS compared to no-ICI (12.5 months vs 9.1, p < 0.001). In the 109 patients who had both a known PD-L1 expression and KRAS status, 80.4% of patients with KRAS mutation had PD-L1 expression vs 61.9% in wild-type KRAS patients (p = 0.04). In patients without a KRAS mutation, there was no difference in OS between the ICI-90 vs no-ICI cohort with a one-year survival of 60.2% vs 54.8% (p = 0.84). However, in patients with a KRAS mutation, ICI-90 led to a one-year survival of 60.4% vs 34.1% (p = 0.004). Patients with NSCLCBM who received ICI-90 had improved OS compared to no-ICI patients. Additionally, this benefit appears to be observed primarily in patients with KRAS mutations that may drive the overall benefit, which should be taken into account in the development of future trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document