Endometriumkarzinom: Kombination aus Lenvatinib und Pembrolizumab zeigt Wirksamkeit unabhängig vom Mikrosatellitenstatus

<b>Purpose:</b> Patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma have limited treatment options. We report final primary efficacy analysis results for a patient cohort with advanced endometrial carcinoma receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in an ongoing phase Ib/II study of selected solid tumors. <b>Methods:</b> Patients took lenvatinib 20 mg once daily orally plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks, in 3-week cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks (ORRWk24); secondary efficacy end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Tumor assessments were evaluated by investigators per immune-related RECIST. <b>Results:</b> At data cutoff, 108 patients with previously treated endometrial carcinoma were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 18.7 months. The ORRWk24 was 38.0% (95% CI, 28.8% to 47.8%). Among subgroups, the ORRWk24 (95% CI) was 63.6% (30.8% to 89.1%) in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors (n = 11) and 36.2% (26.5% to 46.7%) in patients with microsatellite-stable tumors (n = 94). For previously treated patients, regardless of tumor MSI status, the median DOR was 21.2 months (95% CI, 7.6 months to not estimable), median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.7 months), and median OS was 16.7 months (15.0 months to not estimable). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 83/124 (66.9%) patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma who have experienced disease progression after prior systemic therapy, regardless of tumor MSI status. The combination therapy had a manageable toxicity profile. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02501096.

Nivolumab (Opdivo) in combination with Ipilimumab (Yervoy)

CADTH reimbursement reviews are comprehensive assessments of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and clinician perspectives, of a drug or drug class. The assessments inform non-binding recommendations that help guide the reimbursement decisions of Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec. This review assesses nivolumab (Opdivo) 10 mg/mL for injection; administered by IV infusion and ipilimumab (Yervoy) 5 mg/mL for injection; administered by IV infusion Indication: Nivolumab (Opdivo) in combination with ipilimumab (Yervoy) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable MPM who have not received prior systemic therapy for MPM

Phase II study of SM-88 in Ewing's and other sarcomas.

e23505 Background: Sarcomas are rare heterogeneous malignancies. Once recurrent, cure is uncommon. SM-88 (racemetyrosine) is an amino acid analogue with no known cross resistance to typical sarcoma regimens. Based on previous anecdotal experience in Ewing’s (EWS) we initiated a Phase 2 trial (HopES) in EWS and other sarcomas (Ss) after >1 prior systemic therapy. We now report preliminary data after having met prespecified continuation criteria. Methods: Open label prospective trial in 2 separate cohorts (EWS and Ss) of oral SM-88 used with MPS conditioning agents (SM-88 920 mg, methoxsalen 10 mg, phenytoin 50 mg, sirolimus 0.5 mg) all daily until progression. Results: As of Feb 5 2021, 10 pts with incurable sarcomas were enrolled; 4 had high risk but stable EWS. Average age 43.9 yrs (13–77); 70% white; 20% female. Median number of prior regimens 4 (1–9); 70% received prior RT; 50% prior surgery. Median time from initial diagnosis 39.5 months with 50% T2 (40% unknown), 30% M1 (30% unknown). Prespecified futility stopping was exceeded (i.e., >1 of first 5 subjects/cohort) upon achieving clinical benefit in each. Stable disease was achieved in 75.0% (6/8 with available data). Time on treatment (TTx) exceeded last known TTx in 80% (95% CI 44.4–97.5). Median SM-88 TTx was 4.9 vs 2.9 mo for prior TTx (logrank HR 0.53; p=0.12). One EWS subject had unresectable disease that became resectable, was completely resected, and remained disease-free for ≥ 6 months. Prior to SM-88, longest TTx was 12 mo (on IT*) and shortest TTx 1 mo (on IEV*) vs SM-88 TTx of 11.9 mo. An angiosarcoma subject had a 21% reduction in the sum of all target lesions and exceeded all prior TTx (including 8 mo on Ap/N* with 12+ mo duration of treatment of SM-88). There were no serious drug-related AEs. ECOG performance remained stable for all. Conclusions: SM-88 has exceeded pre-specified futility in both cohorts (EWS maintenance and Ss salvage). HopES continues to enroll toward the planned total of 12 subjects to more precisely define its benefit in this ultra-orphan, extremely recalcitrant disease. This trial now confirms the previously reported clinical utility of oral SM-88 in EWS and other high-risk sarcomas. Based on durable response (>6mo), SD and prolonged TTx, SM-88 warrants additional investigation in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03778996. [Table: see text]

Inducible T-cell co-stimulatory (ICOS) receptor agonist, feladilimab (fela), alone and in combination (combo) with pembrolizumab (P): Results from INDUCE-1 urothelial carcinoma (UC) expansion cohorts (ECs).

4519 Background: INDUCE-1 is a first-in-human trial evaluating fela, an IgG4 ICOS agonist non-T-cell depleting mAb, as monotherapy (mono) and in combo with P. ECs include tumor types, such as UC, with high ICOS expression and immunotherapy-favorable features. Fela induced IFNγ, increased PD-1/L1 expression, and enhanced antitumor activity in combo with PD-1 blockade nonclinically. We report preliminary efficacy, safety, and biomarker data of fela ± P in INDUCE-1 UC ECs. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had recurrent/metastatic (R/M) UC of the upper or lower urinary tract, ≤6 prior systemic therapy lines in the advanced setting, measurable disease, and no active autoimmune disease. Pts received 0.3 or 1 mg/kg fela (mono EC; anti-PD-1/L1–experienced [exp] pts) or 0.3 mg/kg fela + 200 mg P (combo EC; anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts) every 3 wks, up to 35 cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease was assessed every 9 wks through wk 54, then every 12 wks. Archival and/or fresh biopsy tumor tissue was collected for biomarker analyses and safety assessed. Results: By Nov 6 2020, 13 anti-PD-1/L1–exp and 32 anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts were evaluable in the mono and combo ECs, respectively. In the mono EC, median age was 69 yrs (range: 47–82), 92% of pts were male, and 85% received ≥2 prior therapy lines in the metastatic setting. In the combo EC, median age was 70 yrs (range: 42–84), 75% of pts were male, and 72% received ≥1 prior therapy line in the metastatic setting. In the mono EC, median duration of follow-up (mDoF) was 10.6 mo (range: 1.1–22.8); overall response rate (ORR) was 8% (1 partial response [PR]; 95% CI: 0.2, 36.0) with a duration of response (DoR) of 6.1 mo; disease control rate (DCR [response or stable disease for ≥9 wks]) was 23% (95% CI: 5.0, 53.8), and median overall survival (mOS) was 14.5 mo (95% CI: 2.8, NR), with 74% of pts alive at 6 mo. In the combo EC, mDoF was 9.6 mo (range: 0.9–28.3); ORR was 22% (7 PRs; 95% CI: 9.3, 40.0) with a median DoR of 8.3 months (range: 3.5–23.3+); DCR was 63% (95% CI: 43.7, 78.9), and mOS was 10.7 mo (95% CI: 5.2, 18.1), with 64% of pts alive at 6 mo. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were reported for 0% and 9% of pts in the mono (N = 16) and combo (N = 44) safety populations, respectively. PD-L1 expression and ICOS-specific biomarkers are being evaluated, with promising trends observed in enrichment of clinical activity in preliminary analyses. Conclusions: Fela is the first ICOS agonist with reported single-agent activity in anti-PD-1/L1–exp relapsed/refractory UC. Fela + P in combo shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety in PD-1/L1–naïve R/M UC. Further study is warranted. Updated data to be presented. Funding: Study 204691 (NCT02723955) funded by GlaxoSmithKline in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Clinical trial information: NCT02723955.

Systematic literature review of the real-world burden and use of chemotherapies for treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

e17571 Background: Women diagnosed with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival of only 15% to 17%. While a multi-modality approach is often used for newly diagnosed EC including platinum-based chemotherapy, there are no definitively approved standard treatment options for advanced or recurrent EC following prior systemic therapy (FPST). The real-world evidence surrounding the effectiveness of chemotherapies in this setting is not well characterized. We conducted a systematic literature review to attempt to fill this evidence gap. Methods: Systematic searches were run in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library to identify English-language publications from January 2000 to July 2020. Additional hand searches of 5 key conferences held from 2018 to 2020 were also conducted. The review included observational studies reporting the clinical effectiveness, safety, or treatment patterns of pharmacological treatments in adult women with advanced or recurrent EC. Results: Seventy-seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria, of these 63 studies reported on the effectiveness of chemotherapies. While 57 studies described adjuvant chemotherapy use, 6 described use of chemotherapies FPST, including 1 study in the second line or later. Only one of these 6 studies reported a sample size greater than 100 patients. Chemotherapy FPST included paclitaxel/carboplatin (3 studies), doxorubicin (2 studies), etoposide (1 study), or any platinum-based chemotherapy (1 study). Shorter median overall survival (OS) was observed in patients with treatment-free intervals (TFI) < 6 months from prior systemic therapy (5.5-11.3 months; 2 studies) compared to those with TFI > 6 months (13.0-27.0 months; 3 studies). Similarly, shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) was seen in patients with TFI < 6 months from prior systemic therapy (2.0-3.2 months; 2 studies) vs. those with TFI > 6 months (6.0-10.0 months; 3 studies). Conclusions: Women with advanced or recurrent EC have poor OS and PFS with current chemotherapy regimens, especially for those with TFI < 6 months. The time at recurrence from prior systemic therapy seems to correlate with the outcomes of subsequent treatment. Novel efficacious treatment strategies are required to improve patients’ outcomes in the FPST setting. While extensive real-world evidence exists for patients with EC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, real world data is limited for use of chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent setting, warranting further research in larger samples of patients.

KEYNOTE-555 Cohort B: Efficacy, safety, and PK of pembrolizumab (pembro) 400 mg every 6 weeks (Q6W) as 1L therapy for advanced melanoma.

9541 Background: In KEYNOTE-555, a model-based approach suggested expected drug exposure with pembro 400 mg Q6W is similar to that observed with approved doses of pembro 200 mg or 2 mg/kg Q3W. The pembro Q6W dose is now approved. We present interim efficacy, safety and PK of 1L pembro 400 mg Q6W for patients (pts) with advanced melanoma in KEYNOTE-555 Cohort B (NCT03665597). Methods: Eligible pts had unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, ECOG PS ≤1, and no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease.Pts received pembro 400 mg Q6W for up to 18 cycles (≈2 years).The primary efficacy endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included PFS by BICR per RECIST v1.1 and safety. PK profile and exposure were evaluated for cycle 1 and steady state (cycle 4). Results: Between May 2019 and Jan 2020, 101 pts were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of pembro. Baseline characteristics were generally similar to pt cohorts of historical pembro studies in advanced melanoma. As of the data cutoff date of August 6, 2020, all pts had ≥6 mo of follow-up and 40.6% of pts had discontinued study treatment. Median (range) duration of treatment and doses administered were 8.2 mo (1 day–13.9 mo) and 6 (1–11) doses, respectively. Observed exposure with pembro 400 mg Q6W had lower variability than model predictions and was within PK parameters from clinical experience with other pembro regimens (Table). ORR was 50.5% (95% CI 40.4–60.6). 12.9% of pts had CR and 37.6% had PR. Median PFS was 13.8 mo (95% CI 3.0–not reached). Estimated PFS rates were 56.5% at 6 mo and 54.3% at 12 mo. Treatment-related AEs of any grade occurred in 79.2% of pts (grade 3–4: 6.9% of pts; no deaths due to a treatment-related AE). The most common immune-mediated AEs were hyperthyroidism (6.9%) and hypothyroidism (6.9%). Conclusions: 1L treatment with pembro 400 mg Q6W yielded a clinically meaningful ORR in pts with advanced melanoma. PK, efficacy and safety results from KEYNOTE-555 Cohort B support prior findings from the model-based assessment and indicate that the benefit-risk profile for the more practical pembro 400 mg Q6W regimen is consistent with that of 200 mg or 2 mg/kg Q3W regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT03665597. [Table: see text]

Pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy for previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 study.

4074 Background: Results from cohort 1 of KEYNOTE-224, an open-label, single-arm, multi-country phase 2 trial, demonstrated that pembro monotherapy was efficacious and tolerable in patients (pts) with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Here, we report results from KEYNOTE-224 cohort 2, which enrolled pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible pts in cohort 2 had radiologically, histologically, or cytologically confirmed, incurable HCC not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy, Child Pugh A liver disease, measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), ECOG PS 0-1, and BCLC stage C or B. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for ̃2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or investigator decision. Primary endpoint was ORR (RECIST 1.1 by BICR). Secondary endpoints included DOR, DCR, TTP, PFS, OS, and safety/tolerability. Response was assessed every 9 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed in pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. DOR was assessed in responders. The estimate and 95% CI of the ORR and DCR were based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, PFS, and DOR. A sample size of ̃50 pts was chosen to provide acceptable precision for the assessment of ORR. Results: Cohort 2 enrolled 51 pts. The median time from the first dose to data cutoff (July 31, 2020) was 21 (range, 17-23) mo. The median age of pts was 68 (range, 41-91) years, one pt was HBV+, 80% had alcohol use, 8% were HCV+, 18% had vascular invasion, 35% had extrahepatic disease, 33% had BCLC Stage B disease, and 67% had BCLC Stage C HCC. ORR was 16% (95% CI, 7-29) and was similar across most subgroups. Median DOR was not reached (range, 3-20+ mo); 70% were estimated to have response duration ≥12 mo. Best overall responses were 0 CR, 8 (16%) PRs, 21 (41%) SDs, and 17 (33%) PDs; response was not evaluable or not assessed for 5 (10%) pts. DCR was 57%. The median TTP was 4 (95% CI, 3-8) mo. The median PFS was 4 (95% CI, 2-6) mo, and median OS was 17 (95% CI, 8-NA) mo. PFS rate at 18 mo was 16%, and OS rate at 18 mo was 46%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 27 (53%) pts; the most common TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, hypothyroidism, and myalgia. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 7 (14%) pts. TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of pts. Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 11 (22%) pts. One treatment-related death occurred due to myocarditis, with associated immune-related hepatitis. Conclusions: In pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy, pembro monotherapy provided durable anti-tumor activity, promising overall survival, and demonstrated a safety profile consistent with that previously observed for pembro in advanced HCC. These findings support further evaluation of pembro-based regimens for the treatment of HCC in the frontline setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.