scholarly journals Long-term clinical activity, safety and patient-reported quality of life for emactuzumab-treated patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour

2020 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 162-170
Author(s):  
Philippe A. Cassier ◽  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
Carlos Gomez-Roca ◽  
Christophe Le Tourneau ◽  
Maud Toulmonde ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 96-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1111-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. van der Heijden ◽  
M. J. L. Mastboom ◽  
P. D. S. Dijkstra ◽  
M. A. J. van de Sande

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (3) ◽  
pp. 272-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. G. M. Verspoor ◽  
M. J. L. Mastboom ◽  
G. Hannink ◽  
W. T. A. van der Graaf ◽  
M. A. J. van de Sande ◽  
...  

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and joint function in tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) patients before and after surgical treatment. Patients and Methods This prospective cohort study run in two Dutch referral centres assessed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)) in 359 consecutive patients with localized- and diffuse-type TGCT of large joints. Patients with recurrent disease (n = 121) and a wait-and-see policy (n = 32) were excluded. Collected data were analyzed at specified time intervals preoperatively (baseline) and/or postoperatively up to five years. Results A total of 206 TGCT patients, 108 localized- and 98 diffuse-type, were analyzed. Median age at diagnosis of localized- and diffuse-type was 41 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 49) and 37 years (IQR 27 to 47), respectively. SF-36 analyses showed statistically significant and clinically relevant deteriorated preoperative and immediate postoperative scores compared with general Dutch population means, depending on subscale and TGCT subtype. After three to six months of follow-up, these scores improved to general population means and continued to be fairly stable over the following years. VAS scores, for both subtypes, showed no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences pre- or postoperatively. In diffuse-type patients, the improvement in median WOMAC score was statistically significant and clinically relevant preoperatively versus six to 24 months postoperatively, and remained up to five years’ follow-up. Conclusion Patients with TGCT report a better HRQoL and joint function after surgery. Pain scores, which vary hugely between patients and in patients over time, did not improve. A disease-specific PROM would help to decipher the impact of TGCT on patients’ daily life and functioning in more detail. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:272–280.


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 02012
Author(s):  
Olga Shchelkova ◽  
Ekaterina Usmanova

Introduction – in the last decades, scientific research of health related quality of life (QoL) is developing fast worldwide. QoL concept pays attention to emotional experience of disease in patients, particularly to personal sense of possibility to satisfy actual needs and possibility of full social functioning in spite of disease specific limitations. The aim of the study was to reveal the basic aspects and personality factors of QoL in patients with bone tumour. Results: the study revealed that patients with bone metastases assess their health significantly worse than other patients. Besides, patients with osteosarcoma evaluate their general health higher than patients with giant cell tumour. Social functioning in patients with chondrosarcoma is higher than in patients with bone metastases and patients with giant cell tumour. Patients with chondrosarcoma have higher physical functioning and less restricted in daily activities than patients with bone metastases. Patients with bone metastases have the most intensive pain among all patients. Moreover, the study revealed personality significant influence on QoL related to bone tumour. Conclusion – patients with bone metastasis have lower QoL compared to patients with primary bone tumours. Patients with giant cell tumour have the worth quality of life among patients with primary bone tumours. Furthermore the results revealed differences in QoL parameters associated with personality characteristics in patients with bone tumour.


2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (7) ◽  
pp. 984-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Gortzak ◽  
M. Vitenberg ◽  
T. Frenkel Rutenberg ◽  
Y. Kollender ◽  
S. Dadia ◽  
...  

Aims Intra-articular 90Yttrium (90Y) is an adjunct to surgical treatment by synovectomy for patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour (dtTGCT) of the knee, with variable success rates. Clinical information is, however, sparse and its value remains unclear. We investigated the long-term outcome of patients who underwent synovectomy with and without adjuvant treatment with 90Yttrium. Patients and Methods All patients with dtTGCT of the knee who underwent synovectomy between 1991 and 2014 were included in the study. Group A patients underwent synovectomy and an intra-articular injection of 90Yttrium between six and eight weeks after surgery. Group B patients underwent surgery alone. Results There were 34 patients in group A and 22 in group B. Recurrence of dtTGCT was identified by MRI, which was undertaken in patients with further symptoms. At a mean follow-up of 7.3 years (2.5 to 25.4), there was residual disease in 15 patients in group A and 11 in group B (p < 0.363). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at final follow-up was 85% and 83%, respectively (p < 0.91). Conclusion There were no significant differences in outcome between patients treated surgically for dtTGCT of the knee with or without an adjuvant intra-articular injection of 90Yttrium. We were unable to provide conclusive evidence of any benefits derived from the adjuvant treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:984–8.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e049292
Author(s):  
Edward Baker ◽  
Ceri Battle ◽  
Abhishek Banjeri ◽  
Edward Carlton ◽  
Christine Dixon ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the long-term outcomes and health-related quality of life in patients with blunt thoracic injuries over 6 months from hospital discharge and develop models to predict long-term patient-reported outcomes.DesignA prospective observational study using longitudinal survey design.SettingThe study recruitment was undertaken at 12 UK hospitals which represented diverse geographical locations and covered urban, suburban and rural areas across England and Wales.Participants337 patients admitted to hospital with blunt thoracic injuries were recruited between June 2018–October 2020.MethodsParticipants completed a bank of two quality of life surveys (Short Form-12 (SF-12) and EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels) and two pain questionnaires (Brief Pain Inventory and painDETECT Questionnaire) at four time points over the first 6 months after discharge from hospital. A total of 211 (63%) participants completed the outcomes data at 6 months after hospital discharge.Outcomes measuresThree outcomes were measured using pre-existing and validated patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes included: Poor physical function (SF-12 Physical Component Score); chronic pain (Brief Pain Inventory Pain Severity Score); and neuropathic pain (painDETECT Questionnaire).ResultsDespite a trend towards improving physical functional and pain at 6 months, outcomes did not return to participants perceived baseline level of function. At 6 months after hospital discharge, 37% (n=77) of participants reported poor physical function; 36.5% (n=77) reported a chronic pain state; and 22% (n=47) reported pain with a neuropathic component. Predictive models were developed for each outcome highlighting important data collection requirements for predicting long-term outcomes in this population. Model diagnostics including calibration and discrimination statistics suggested good model fit in this development cohort.ConclusionsThis study identified the recovery trajectories for patients with blunt thoracic injuries over the first 6 months after hospital discharge and present prognostic models for three important outcomes which after external validation could be used as clinical risk stratification scores.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document