Use of fractional flow reserve versus stress perfusion scintigraphy in stent restenosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Krüger ◽  
Karl-Christian Koch ◽  
Ira Kaumanns ◽  
Marc W. Merx ◽  
Wolfgang M. Schäfer ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Angela McInerney ◽  
Alejandro Travieso Gonzalez ◽  
Alex Castro Mejía ◽  
Gabriela Tirado‐Conte ◽  
Hernán Mejía‐Rentería ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 2040-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
R LOPEZPALOP ◽  
E PINAR ◽  
I LOZANO ◽  
D SAURA ◽  
F PICO ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 1645-1649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Krüger ◽  
Karl-Christian Koch ◽  
Ira Kaumanns ◽  
Marc W. Merx ◽  
Peter Hanrath ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1115-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massoud A Leesar ◽  
Talal Abdul-Baki ◽  
Nuri I Akkus ◽  
Anil Sharma ◽  
Tarif Kannan ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 817-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branko Beleslin ◽  
Milan Dobric ◽  
Dragana Sobic-Saranovic ◽  
Vojislav Giga ◽  
Jelena Stepanovic ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Rai ◽  
Mostafa Bahremand ◽  
Mohammad Reza Saidi ◽  
Zahra Jalili ◽  
Nahid Salehi ◽  
...  

<p>Measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has predictive value for PCI outcome. We decided to examine the utility of pre- and post-stenting FFR as a predictor of 6-month stent restenosis as well as MACE (major adverse cardiac events). Pre- and post-stenting FFR values were measured for 60 PCI patients. Within 6 months after stenting, all patients were followed for assessment of cardiac MACE including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or positive exercise test. Stent restenosis was also assessed. Cut-off values for pre- and post-stenting FFR measurements were considered respectively as 0.65 and 0.92.Stent restenosis was detected in 4 patients (6.6%). All 4 patients (100%) with restenosis had pre-stenting FFR of &lt; 0.65, while only 26 of 56 patients without restenosis (46.4%) had pre-stenting FFR value of &lt; 0.65 (P= 0.039). Mean pre-stenting FFR in patients with restenosis was significantly lower than in those without restenosis (0.25 ± 0.01 vs. 0.53 ± 0.03, P= 0.022). Although stent restenosis was higher in patients with post-stenting FFR of &lt; 0.92 (2 cases, 9.5%) than in those with FFR value of ≥ 0.92 (2 cases, 5.1%), the difference was not statistically (P= 0.510). Pre-stenting FFR, the use of longer stents, and history of diabetes mellitus can predict stent restenosis, but the value of post-stenting FFR for predicting restenosis was not explicit.</p>


Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 758-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Hennigan ◽  
Colin Berry ◽  
Damien Collison ◽  
David Corcoran ◽  
Hany Eteiba ◽  
...  

IntroductionThere is conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with grey zone fractional flow reserve (GZFFR artery) values (0.75–0.80). The prevalence of ischaemia is unknown. We wished to define the prevalence of ischaemia in GZFFR artery and assess whether PCI is superior to optimal medical therapy (OMT) for angina control.MethodsWe enrolled 104 patients with angina with 1:1 randomisation to PCI or OMT. The artery was interrogated with a Doppler flow/pressure wire. Patients underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with follow-up at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome was angina status at 3 months using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).Results104 patients (age 60±9 years), 79 (76%) males and 79 (76%) Left Anterior Descending (LAD) stenoses were randomised. Coronary physiology and SAQ were similar. Of 98 patients with stress perfusion MRI data, 17 (17%) had abnormal perfusion (≥2 segments with ≥25% ischaemia or ≥1 segment with ≥50% ischaemia) in the target GZFFR artery. Of 89 patients with invasive physiology data, 26 (28%) had coronary flow velocity reserve <2.0 in the target GZFFR artery. After 3 months of follow-up, compared with patients treated with OMT only, patients treated by PCI and OMT had greater improvements in SAQ angina frequency (21 (28) vs 10 (23); p=0.026) and quality of life (24 (26) vs 11 (24); p=0.008) though these differences were no longer significant at 12 months.ConclusionsNon-invasive evidence of major ischaemia is uncommon in patients with GZFFR artery. Compared with OMT alone, patients randomised to undergo PCI reported improved symptoms after 3 months but these differences were no longer significant after 12 months.Trial registration numberNCT02425969.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document