scholarly journals Utility of the fractional flow reserve in the evaluation of angiographically moderate in-stent restenosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 2040-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
R LOPEZPALOP ◽  
E PINAR ◽  
I LOZANO ◽  
D SAURA ◽  
F PICO ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Angela McInerney ◽  
Alejandro Travieso Gonzalez ◽  
Alex Castro Mejía ◽  
Gabriela Tirado‐Conte ◽  
Hernán Mejía‐Rentería ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Krüger ◽  
Karl-Christian Koch ◽  
Ira Kaumanns ◽  
Marc W. Merx ◽  
Wolfgang M. Schäfer ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 1645-1649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Krüger ◽  
Karl-Christian Koch ◽  
Ira Kaumanns ◽  
Marc W. Merx ◽  
Peter Hanrath ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Rai ◽  
Mostafa Bahremand ◽  
Mohammad Reza Saidi ◽  
Zahra Jalili ◽  
Nahid Salehi ◽  
...  

<p>Measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has predictive value for PCI outcome. We decided to examine the utility of pre- and post-stenting FFR as a predictor of 6-month stent restenosis as well as MACE (major adverse cardiac events). Pre- and post-stenting FFR values were measured for 60 PCI patients. Within 6 months after stenting, all patients were followed for assessment of cardiac MACE including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or positive exercise test. Stent restenosis was also assessed. Cut-off values for pre- and post-stenting FFR measurements were considered respectively as 0.65 and 0.92.Stent restenosis was detected in 4 patients (6.6%). All 4 patients (100%) with restenosis had pre-stenting FFR of &lt; 0.65, while only 26 of 56 patients without restenosis (46.4%) had pre-stenting FFR value of &lt; 0.65 (P= 0.039). Mean pre-stenting FFR in patients with restenosis was significantly lower than in those without restenosis (0.25 ± 0.01 vs. 0.53 ± 0.03, P= 0.022). Although stent restenosis was higher in patients with post-stenting FFR of &lt; 0.92 (2 cases, 9.5%) than in those with FFR value of ≥ 0.92 (2 cases, 5.1%), the difference was not statistically (P= 0.510). Pre-stenting FFR, the use of longer stents, and history of diabetes mellitus can predict stent restenosis, but the value of post-stenting FFR for predicting restenosis was not explicit.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Shah R Mohdnazri ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
Thomas R Keeble ◽  
...  

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been shown to improve outcomes when used to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There have been two proposed cut-off points for FFR. The first was derived by comparing FFR against a series of non-invasive tests, with a value of ≤0.75 shown to predict a positive ischaemia test. It was then shown in the DEFER study that a vessel FFR value of ≥0.75 was associated with safe deferral of PCI. During the validation phase, a ‘grey zone’ for FFR values of between 0.76 and 0.80 was demonstrated, where a positive non-invasive test may still occur, but sensitivity and specificity were sub-optimal. Clinical judgement was therefore advised for values in this range. The FAME studies then moved the FFR cut-off point to ≤0.80, with a view to predicting outcomes. The ≤0.80 cut-off point has been adopted into clinical practice guidelines, whereas the lower value of ≤0.75 is no longer widely used. Here, the authors discuss the data underpinning these cut-off values and the practical implications for their use when using FFR guidance in PCI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document