Ulcerative colitis: A scientometric approach to the global research output and network

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. e41-e43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Schöffel ◽  
Michael H.K. Bendels ◽  
David A. Groneberg
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Global Research

scholarly journals The Arab region’s contribution to global COVID-19 research: Bibliometric and visualization analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sa’ed H. Zyoud
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Arab World ◽  
The United States ◽  
Arab Countries ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Global Research

Abstract Background At the global level and in the Arab world, particularly in low-income countries, COVID-19 remains a major public health issue. As demonstrated by an incredible number of COVID-19-related publications, the research science community responded rapidly. Therefore, this study was intended to assess the growing contribution of the Arab world to global research on COVID-19. Methods For the period between December 2019 and March 2021, the search for publications was conducted via the Scopus database using terms linked to COVID-19. VOSviewer 1.6.16 software was applied to generate a network map to assess hot topics in this area and determine the collaboration patterns between different countries. Furthermore, the research output of Arab countries was adjusted in relation to population size and gross domestic product (GDP). Results A total of 143,975 publications reflecting the global overall COVID-19 research output were retrieved. By restricting analysis to the publications published by the Arab countries, the research production was 6131 documents, representing 4.26% of the global research output regarding COVID-19. Of all these publications, 3990 (65.08%) were original journal articles, 980 (15.98%) were review articles, 514 (8.38%) were letters and 647 (10.55%) were others, such as editorials or notes. The highest number of COVID-19 publications was published by Saudi Arabia (n = 2186, 35.65%), followed by Egypt (n = 1281, 20.78%) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), (n = 719, 11.73%). After standardization by population size and GDP, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Lebanon had the highest publication productivity. The collaborations were mostly with researchers from the United States (n = 968), followed by the United Kingdom (n = 661). The main research lines identified in COVID-19 from the Arab world are related to: public health and epidemiology; immunological and pharmaceutical research; signs, symptoms and clinical diagnosis; and virus detection. Conclusions A novel analysis of the latest Arab COVID-19-related studies is discussed in the current study and how these findings are connected to global production. Continuing and improving future collaboration between developing and developed countries will also help to facilitate the sharing of responsibilities for COVID-19 in research results and the implementation of policies for COVID-19.

scholarly journals Mapping the global research output on Ebola vaccine from research indexed in web of science and scopus: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Tosin Yinka Akintunde ◽  
Taha Hussein Musa ◽  
Hassan Hussein Musa ◽  
Shaojun Chen ◽  
Elhakim Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Global Research

Molar Pregnancy in the Last 50 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Output

Placenta ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ourlad Alzeus G. Tantengco ◽  
Federico Cristobal C. De Jesus ◽  
Eloina Faye S. Gampoy ◽  
Eric David B. Ornos ◽  
Manuel S. Vidal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Molar Pregnancy ◽  
Global Research

scholarly journals A big picture: bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maia Chankseliani ◽  
Andrey Lovakov ◽  
Vladimir Pislyakov
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Historical Context ◽  
Research Capacity ◽  
Scarce Resources ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
Academic Publications ◽  
Big Picture ◽  
Global Research

AbstractThe world’s largest community of scientists disintegrated following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. With extremely scarce resources and limited academic freedom as starting points, researchers in this region have been creating new knowledge; they have been building on rich scientific traditions in selected disciplines and, at times, paving new paths in non-traditional disciplines. At present, the cumulative contribution of post-Soviet countries to global research output is only three percent, indicating that these countries are not key players on the global research scene. This study uses bibliometric methods to offer novel empirical insight into the quantity and impact of academic publications; it also looks at the quality of journals in which the output is published. The findings reveal that fifteen post-Soviet countries differ considerably in terms of how much they have prioritised research, as well as the quantity, quality, and impact of their publications. The research productivity across the region has not been high and, taken together, these countries have produced publications of considerably lower quality and lower impact when viewed in the context of global research output. At the same time, researchers from post-Soviet countries tap into international collaborative networks actively, resulting in an exceptionally large proportion of publications from this region being internationally co-authored. In the historical context of Soviet research being known as one of the least collaborative globally, this finding indicates that researchers in the region are attractive to international collaborators and may be seeking such partnerships due to relatively modest research capacity at home.

scholarly journals Arthroplasty and global research output: A bibliometric analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathleen J. O'Neill ◽  
Adrian J. Cassar-Gheiti ◽  
James A. Harty
Keyword(s):  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Global Research

scholarly journals Mapping Global Research Output in Big Data during 2007-16

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Dhawan ◽  
Brij Mohan Gupta ◽  
Ritu Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Major Subject ◽  
Recent Origin ◽  
Subject Areas ◽  
Major Discipline ◽  
Highly Cited ◽  
Global Research

The paper examines global research in big data, as covered in Scopus database 2007-16, on a series of bibliometric indicators. The study finds that big data registered exceedingly fast growth (135.2%), but averaged low citation impact per paper (3.75) and accounted for very low share of highly cited papers (0.86%) in 10 years. The study reports publication trends in big data research by top countries, top institutions, top authors, top journals, major subject areas, publication modes, and country-level share of international collaborative publications. The study concludes that big data is a subject of recent origin. Given its major potential to impact business, governance, society, healthcare, industry and many other sectors, big data is fast emerging as a major discipline of interest and importance to nations, corporates, and institutions across developed and fast emerging economies.

Global Research Output in Occupational Health From 1998–2018

2021 ◽  
pp. 121-140
Author(s):  
Senthamilselvi A.
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Health ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Global Level ◽  
Online Database ◽  
Global Research

An analysis of 12,317 publications published by Research Productivity on Occupational Health during 1998-2018 and indexed by Web of Science online database indicates the publication output in the global level research productivity of the publication. The highest numbers of papers were published during the year 2018 with 1,237 records followed by the year 2016 with 1,189 records. Overall, 31,498 authors contributed 2,866 publications in the journal and global cited scores with 149,345 records of the articles. A total of 138 countries have contributed in publications of the output of total research productivity. In this research, it is found that articles have been written using 25 languages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document