Combined perineal massage and warm compress compared to massage alone during active second stage of labour in nulliparas: A randomised trial

Author(s):  
Jesrine Gek Shan Hong ◽  
Nadiah Abdullah ◽  
Rajeev Kumar Rajaratnam ◽  
Suriyanti Ahmad Shukri ◽  
Sze Ping Tan ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Abinaya Raja ◽  
Pallavee P. ◽  
Rupal Samal

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether perineal massage during second stage of labour could decrease perineal trauma in the form of episiotomy and perineal tears.Methods: One hundred and fifty term antenatal women in labour were randomly assigned to two groups, one of which received perineal massage and the other received routine care during the second stage. Frequency of episiotomies, perineal tears, intact perineums, degrees of perineal tears, duration of second stage of labour and perineal pain after 24 hours was compared.Results: Perineal massage was efficient in reducing incidence of episiotomy, duration of second stage of labour and perineal pain assessed 24 hours after delivery. The frequency of perineal tears and intact perineums did not differ significantly. Perineal massage was protective against severe form of third degree perineal tears.Conclusions: Authors suggest that perineal massage can be routinely practiced by health professionals to improve quality of life in women post vaginal delivery.


Author(s):  
P. R. Jong ◽  
R. B. Johanson ◽  
P. Baxen ◽  
V. D. Adrians ◽  
S. Westhuisen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e000906 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Justus Hofmeyr ◽  
Joshua P Vogel ◽  
Mandisa Singata ◽  
Ndema Abu Habib ◽  
Sihem Landoulsi ◽  
...  

IntroductionGentle assisted pushing (GAP) is an innovative method of applying gentle, steady pressure to a woman’s uterine fundus during second stage of labour. This randomised trial evaluated GAP in an upright position, compared with upright position alone or routine practice (recumbent posture).MethodsAn open-label, hospital-based, randomised trial was conducted in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Randomisation occurred following at least 15 min in second stage of labour. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using computer-generated block randomisation of variable size using opaque, sealed, numbered envelopes. Primary analysis was intention to treat. Participants were healthy, nulliparous, consenting women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation where vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was mean time from randomisation to birth.Results1158 participants were randomly allocated to GAP (n=388), upright position (n=386) and routine practice (n=384), with no loss to follow-up. Baseline characteristics were largely similar. In the experimental arm, GAP was applied a median of two times (IQR 1.0–3.0). Women in upright position alone spent a median of 6 min (IQR 3.0–10.0) upright. Mean duration from randomisation to birth was not different across groups (mean (SD) duration: 24.1 (34.9) min in GAP group, 24.6 (30.5) min in upright group, 25.0 (39.3) min in routine practice group). There were no differences in secondary outcomes, except that at two sites maternal discomfort was greater for both GAP and upright position compared with routine practice; at the other sites there were no differences.ConclusionNo benefit was identified from GAP in the second stage; some women found the position uncomfortable. The use of fundal pressure should be limited to further research to determine techniques or settings in which it can safely assist vaginal birth. Women should be encouraged to assume the position they find most comfortable.Trial registration numberPACTR201502001034448.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document