scholarly journals Cost-sensitive business failure prediction when misclassification costs are uncertain: A heterogeneous ensemble selection approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 285 (2) ◽  
pp. 612-630
Author(s):  
Koen W. De Bock ◽  
Kristof Coussement ◽  
Stefan Lessmann
1999 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Zopounidis ◽  
M. Doumpos ◽  
R. Slowinski ◽  
R. Susmaga ◽  
A. I. Dimitras

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xu ◽  
Zhi Xiao ◽  
Xin Dang ◽  
Daoli Yang ◽  
Xianglei Yang

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 207-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hafiz A. Alaka ◽  
Lukumon O. Oyedele ◽  
Hakeem A. Owolabi ◽  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
Saheed O. Ajayi ◽  
...  

This study explored use of big data analytics (BDA) to analyse data of a large number of construction firms to develop a construction business failure prediction model (CB-FPM). Careful analysis of literature revealed financial ratios as the best form of variable for this problem. Because of MapReduce’s unsuitability for iteration problems involved in developing CB-FPMs, various BDA initiatives for iteration problems were identified. A BDA framework for developing CB-FPM was proposed. It was validated by using 150,000 datacells of 30,000 construction firms, artificial neural network, Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, Apache Spark and the R software. The BDA CB-FPM was developed in eight seconds while the same process without BDA was aborted after nine hours without success. This shows the issue of not wanting to use large dataset to develop CB-FPM due to tedious duration is resolvable by applying BDA technique. The BDA CB-FPM largely outperformed an ordinary CB-FPM developed with a dataset of 200 construction firms, proving that use of larger sample size with the aid of BDA, leads to better performing CB-FPMs. The high financial and social cost associated with misclassifications (i.e. model error) thus makes adoption of BDA CB-FPMs very important for, among others, financiers, clients and policy makers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document