Evaluation of prognostic value and stage migration effect using positive lymph node ratio in gastric cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Komatsu ◽  
D. Ichikawa ◽  
M. Nishimura ◽  
T. Kosuga ◽  
K. Okamoto ◽  
...  
Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (16) ◽  
pp. e3395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mu-Xing Li ◽  
Zheng-Xiong Jin ◽  
Jian-Guo Zhou ◽  
Jian-Ming Ying ◽  
Zhi-Yong Liang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1565-1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Komatsu ◽  
Daisuke Ichikawa ◽  
Mahito Miyamae ◽  
Toshiyuki Kosuga ◽  
Kazuma Okamoto ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 207 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao-yan Zhang ◽  
Jing Yuan ◽  
Zhen-shuang Cui ◽  
Zhong-wu Li ◽  
Xiang-hong Li ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kabsoo Shin ◽  
Se Jun Park ◽  
Jinsoo Lee ◽  
Cho Hyun Park ◽  
Kyo Young Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We sought to assess the prognostic significance of lymph node ratio (LNR) and N stage in patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy, S-1, and XELOX and to compare the efficacy of them according to LNRs and N stages to evaluate the clinical impact of using LNRs compared with using N staging. Methods Patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy with adequate lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III gastric cancer between Mar 2011 and Dec 2016 were analysed. Of the 477 patients enrolled, 331 received S-1 and 146 received XELOX. LNR groups were segregated as 0, 0–0.1, 0.1–0.25, and > 0.25 (LNR0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimise potential selection bias and compare DFS and OS stratified by LNRs and N stages in the two treatment groups. Results After PSM, the sample size of each group was 110 patients, and variables were well balanced. All patients had more than 15 examined lymph nodes (median 51, range 16~124). In multivariate analysis, LNR (> 0.25) and N stage (N3) showed independent prognostic value in OS and DFS, but LNR (> 0.25) showed better prognostic value. In subgroup analysis, the LNR3 group showed better 5-year DFS (20% vs 54%; HR 0.29; p = 0.004) and 5-year OS (26% vs 67%; HR 0.28; p = 0.020) in the XELOX group. The N3 group showed better 5-year DFS (38% vs 66%; HR 0.40; p = 0.004) and 5-year OS (47% vs 71%; HR 0.45; p = 0.019) in the XELOX group. Stage IIIC showed better 5-year DFS (22% vs 57%; HR 0.32; p = 0.004) and 5-year OS (27% vs 68%; HR 0.32; p = 0.009) in the XELOX group. The LNR3 group within N3 patients showed better 5-year DFS (21% vs 55%; HR 0.31; p = 0.004) and 5-year OS (27% vs 68%; HR 0.34; p = 0.018) in the XELOX group. Conclusions LNR showed better prognostic value than N staging. LNR3, N3 and stage IIIC groups showed the superior efficacy of XELOX to that of S-1. And the LNR3 group within N3 patients showed more survival benefit from XELOX. LNR > 0.25, N3 stage and stage IIIC were the discriminant factors for selecting XELOX over S-1. Trial registration Not applicable (retrospective study).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhipeng He ◽  
Dongchang Li ◽  
Siyu Liu ◽  
Endong Song ◽  
Yida Lu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic value of Metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) after curative gastrectomy and the potential for new indicators to strengthen the current guidelines.Methods:We retrospectively examined 3864 patients with GC who underwent curative gastrectomy between February 2011 and February 2016. Patients were classified into low-MLNR (L-MLNR), and high-MLNR (H-MLNR) groups according to adjusted X-tile cutoff-value of 0.25 for MLNR, and their clinicopathological characteristics and survival rates were compared.Results: Survival analysis indicated that MLNR was negatively associated with overall survival (OS) (P<0.001) and was an independent prognostic predictor in 3864 GC patients (P<0.001). Stratum analysis and univariate COX proportional hazards analysis were performed to validate the prognostic value of MLNR in various subgroups with clinicopathological characteristics (gender, age at surgery, tumor location, tumor size, type of gastrectomy, T stage, N stage, ELN, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and TNM stage). MLNR is a prognostic indicator for patients with GC, regardless whether the number of lymph nodes examined is <16 or ≥16.Conclusions:The MLNR may become a new indicator for evaluating prognosis of patients with curative gastrectomy and complement the current guidelines.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e96455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Ke ◽  
Xi-Na Song ◽  
Ning Liu ◽  
Ru-Peng Zhang ◽  
Chang-Li Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document